share_log

Is WD-40 (NASDAQ:WDFC) Using Too Much Debt?

Is WD-40 (NASDAQ:WDFC) Using Too Much Debt?

wd-40 (纳斯达克:WDFC) 是否使用了太多债务?
Simply Wall St ·  07/26 07:18

Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that WD-40 Company (NASDAQ:WDFC) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

霍华德·马克斯说得好,不应该担心股价波动,“我担心的是永久性损失的可能性……我认识的每位实际投资者都会这样担心。” 当我们考虑一家公司有多冒险时,我们总是喜欢查看其使用的债务,因为债务负担过重可能导致破产。 我们看到WD-40公司(纳斯达克:WDFC)确实在业务中使用债务。 但真正的问题是这些债务是否使公司冒险。

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

为什么债务会带来风险?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

债务是帮助企业增长的工具,但如果企业无法偿还债权人,则该企业存在于债权人的怜悯之下。如果情况变得非常糟糕,债权人可以控制该企业。然而,一种更常见(但仍然很痛苦的)情况是,它必须以低价格筹集新的股权资本,从而永久稀释股东权益。话虽如此,最常见的情况是,公司合理地管理其债务,并使其对自身有利。考虑企业使用多少债务时,首先要做的是查看其现金和债务总额。

How Much Debt Does WD-40 Carry?

WD-40负债有多重?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that WD-40 had debt of US$107.8m at the end of May 2024, a reduction from US$136.1m over a year. However, it also had US$45.3m in cash, and so its net debt is US$62.5m.

下面的图像显示,在2024年5月底,WD-40的负债为1.078亿美元,较去年减少了13.61亿美元。 不过,它也有4,530万美元的现金,因此其净负债为6,250万美元。

big
NasdaqGS:WDFC Debt to Equity History July 26th 2024
NasdaqGS:WDFC股本负债历史记录2024年7月26日

How Strong Is WD-40's Balance Sheet?

WD-40资产负债表强度如何?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that WD-40 had liabilities of US$105.2m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$116.1m due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$45.3m as well as receivables valued at US$116.4m due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$59.6m.

通过放大最新的资产负债表数据,我们可以看到WD-40因拖欠金结算和账款所需的负债达1.052亿美元,超过12个月未到期的负债为1.161亿美元。 抵消这些义务,它有4,530万美元的现金以及价值1.164亿美元的应收账款需在12个月内到期。 所以其负债高出其现金和(短期)应收账款的额度为5,960万美元。

Having regard to WD-40's size, it seems that its liquid assets are well balanced with its total liabilities. So it's very unlikely that the US$3.44b company is short on cash, but still worth keeping an eye on the balance sheet.

考虑到WD-40公司的规模,它的流动资产与总负债的平衡非常良好。 因此,这家344亿美元的公司很不可能缺乏现金,但仍需关注资产负债表的情况。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

为了比较一个公司的债务与其收益的关系,我们计算其净债务除以利息、税、折旧和摊销前的收益和利息前的收益(其利息覆盖率)。因此,我们考虑了债务的绝对数量以及支付的利率。

WD-40 has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.60. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 22.0 times over. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. Also good is that WD-40 grew its EBIT at 11% over the last year, further increasing its ability to manage debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if WD-40 can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

WD-40公司的净债务与EBITDA比率仅为0.60,其EBIt覆盖其利息费用达到22.0倍。 因此,我们对其极为保守的使用债务感到放心。 另外,WD-40公司在过去一年中将其EBIt增长了11%,这进一步增加了其管理债务的能力。 毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中了解债务的大部分信息。 但最终,业务的未来盈利能力将决定WD-40公司是否能够随着时间的推移加强其资产负债表。 因此,如果您想了解专业人士的想法,您可能会发现这份分析师利润预测免费报告很有趣。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, WD-40 produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 63% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.

但我们最后的考虑也很重要,因为公司无法用纸上的利润来支付债务; 它需要硬通货。 因此,我们显然需要关注EBIt是否导致相应的自由现金流。 在过去的三年中,WD-40的自由现金流稳定,相当于其EBIt的63%,正如我们所期望的一样。 这些自由现金流使公司有能力在适当时期偿付债务。

Our View

我们的观点

The good news is that WD-40's demonstrated ability to cover its interest expense with its EBIT delights us like a fluffy puppy does a toddler. And the good news does not stop there, as its net debt to EBITDA also supports that impression! Looking at the bigger picture, we think WD-40's use of debt seems quite reasonable and we're not concerned about it. While debt does bring risk, when used wisely it can also bring a higher return on equity. Over time, share prices tend to follow earnings per share, so if you're interested in WD-40, you may well want to click here to check an interactive graph of its earnings per share history.

好消息是,WD-40公司证明了覆盖利息费用的EBIt令我们像毛绒狗一样欢喜。 好消息并没有止于此,因为其净债务与EBITDA也支持这种印象! 从更大的角度来看,我们认为WD-40公司的债务使用似乎相当合理,我们对此并不担心。 虽然债务确实带来风险,但如果明智地使用,它也可能带来更高的资本回报率。 随着时间的推移,股价往往会跟随每股收益,因此如果您对WD-40感兴趣,您可能希望单击此处以查看其每股收益历史记录的交互式图表。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果您在所有这些工作之后,更感兴趣于拥有坚实资产负债表的快速发展公司,请立即查看我们的净现金成长股列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发