share_log

Recent Uptick Might Appease Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (NASDAQ:FLGT) Institutional Owners After Losing 39% Over the Past Year

Recent Uptick Might Appease Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (NASDAQ:FLGT) Institutional Owners After Losing 39% Over the Past Year

过去一年中,纳斯达克FLGT的机构股东损失了39%,最近上涨可能会使他们感到满意。
Simply Wall St ·  07/27 08:51

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Fulgent Genetics implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
  • Insider ownership in Fulgent Genetics is 34%
  • 机构对Fulgent Genetics的大量持股意味着他们在公司股票价格方面拥有重要的影响力。
  • 业务的52%由前4大股东持有。
  • Fulgent Genetics的内部所有权为34%。

If you want to know who really controls Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (NASDAQ:FLGT), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 50% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想了解真正控制Fulgent Genetics, Inc. (纳斯达克股票代码:FLGT)的人,请查看公司的股权登记簿构成。我们可以看到,机构拥有公司50%的所有权。换句话说,该群体面临最大的上涨潜力或下跌风险。

Institutional investors would appreciate the 8.4% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 39%.

鉴于机构投资者的一年内损失总额达到了令人失望的39%,他们会很欣赏上周股价上涨了8.4%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Fulgent Genetics.

在下图中,我们将重点关注Fulgent Genetics的不同所有权组。

big
NasdaqGM:FLGT Ownership Breakdown July 27th 2024
NasdaqGM:FLGT所有权结构(2024年7月27日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fulgent Genetics?

机构所有权对Fulgent Genetics的提示是什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Fulgent Genetics. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Fulgent Genetics, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所见,机构投资者在Fulgent Genetics中拥有相当数量的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究了这支股票,并且他们喜欢它。但是,像其他人一样,他们也可能犯错。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,值得检查Fulgent Genetics的过去收益轨迹(请参见下文)。当然,还要牢记其他要考虑的因素。

big
NasdaqGM:FLGT Earnings and Revenue Growth July 27th 2024
NasdaqGM:FLGT收益和营业收入增长(2024年7月27日)

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Fulgent Genetics is not owned by hedge funds. The company's CEO Ming Hsieh is the largest shareholder with 29% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 13% and 4.8% of the stock.

投资者应该注意到,实际上,机构拥有超过一半的公司股份,因此他们可以集体发挥重大作用。 Fulgent Genetics不是由对冲基金拥有的。该公司的首席执行官Ming Hsieh是最大的股东,持有29%的流通股。相比之下,第二大和第三大股东持有约13%和4.8%的股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前四名股东控制了公司一半以上的股份,这意味着该集团对公司的决策具有相当大的影响力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Fulgent Genetics

Fulgent Genetics的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Fulgent Genetics, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$688m, and insiders have US$233m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们最近的数据表明,内部人员拥有Fulgent Genetics,Inc.相当比例的股份。它的市值仅为6880万美元,内部人员自己的股票价值为2330万美元。我们会说这表明他们与股东的利益相一致,但值得注意的是,该公司仍然相当小;一些内部人员可能创立了该业务。您可以单击此处查看这些内部人员是否已购买或出售。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in Fulgent Genetics. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

通常是个人投资者的一般公众持有Fulgent Genetics的16%股份。尽管这样的持股比例可能不足以影响他们的政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我觉得查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜欢深入了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以免费访问该互动图表,了解其过去的盈利、营业收入和现金流。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发