share_log

After the Recent Decline, Q Technology (Group) Company Limited (HKG:1478) Top Key Executive Ningning He's Holdings Have Lost 12% of Their Value

After the Recent Decline, Q Technology (Group) Company Limited (HKG:1478) Top Key Executive Ningning He's Holdings Have Lost 12% of Their Value

最近下跌后,Q科技(集团)有限公司(HKG:1478)的重要高管何宁宁的持股价值已经下跌了12%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/27 20:42

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Q Technology (Group)'s significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 64% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Ningning He)
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • Q科技(集团)的重要内部所有权表明其在公司扩张方面具有固有利益。
  • 该公司64%的股份由一位单一股东(何宁宁)持有。
  • 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。

If you want to know who really controls Q Technology (Group) Company Limited (HKG:1478), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 64% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道谁真正控制Q科技(集团)有限公司(HKG:1478),那么您需要观察其股份登记簿的构成。我们可以看到,个人内部人员拥有公司的绝大部分股权,占有64%的股权。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

As market cap fell to HK$5.1b last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

随着市值上周跌至HK $ 5.1亿,内部人员将面临比公司其他股东群体更高的损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Q Technology (Group).

在下面的图表中,我们放大了Q科技(集团)的不同所有权群体。

big
SEHK:1478 Ownership Breakdown July 28th 2024
SEHK:1478所有权分布2024年7月28日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Q Technology (Group)?

机构持股关于Q科技(集团)的提示是什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

We can see that Q Technology (Group) does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Q Technology (Group)'s earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到,Q Technology(Group)确实拥有机构投资者;他们持有公司股份的很大一部分。这意味着为那些机构工作的分析师已经查看了该股票并且他们很喜欢它。但是就像其他任何人一样,他们可能是错误的。如果多个机构同时改变对某只股票的看法,则可以看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得查看Q Technology(Group)下面的收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
SEHK:1478 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 28th 2024
SEHK:1478收益和营收增长2024年7月28日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Q Technology (Group). Our data suggests that Ningning He, who is also the company's Top Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 64%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. Harvest Fund Management Co. Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 1.6% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 1.3% of the company stock.

对冲基金在Q Technology(Group)的股份不多。我们的数据表明,公司的首席关键执行官何宁宁持有最多数量的股份,达到64%。当内部人员持有公司的大量股票时,投资者认为这是一个积极的信号,因为这表明内部人员愿意将自己的财富与公司的未来联系起来。Harvest Fund Management Co. Ltd.是持有1.6%普通股的第二大股东,The Vanguard Group,Inc.持有该公司股票的约1.3%。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Q Technology (Group)

Q科技(集团)的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Q Technology (Group) Company Limited. This gives them effective control of the company. That means they own HK$3.2b worth of shares in the HK$5.1b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,内部人员拥有Q Technology(Group)有限公司超过一半的股份。这使他们对公司拥有有效的控制权。这意味着他们在HK $ 51亿公司中拥有价值HK $ 32亿的股份。这是非常有意义的。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您可能希望(免费)了解他们是否一直在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 29% stake in Q Technology (Group). While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

通常是个人投资者的普通公众持有Q Technology(Group)的29%股份。虽然该集团不能必然掌控公司,但它肯定可以对公司的经营方式产生实质性影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Q Technology (Group) has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是非常值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,需要考虑风险-我们认为Q Technology(Group)存在3个警告信号,您应该了解。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发