share_log

Royal Gold (NASDAQ:RGLD) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

Royal Gold (NASDAQ:RGLD) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

皇家黄金(纳斯达克:RGLD)似乎相当明智地利用了债务。
Simply Wall St ·  07/29 09:15

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. Importantly, Royal Gold, Inc. (NASDAQ:RGLD) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

传奇基金经理李露(由查理·芒格支持)曾经说过:“最大的投资风险不是价格的波动,而是你是否会遭受永久的资本损失。”因此,当你评估公司的风险时,看来聪明的货币知道债务(通常涉及破产)是一个非常重要的因素。重要的是,皇家黄金公司(纳斯达克股票代码:RGLD)确实有债务。但更重要的问题是:这笔债务会带来多大的风险?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

债务何时危险?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

债务可以帮助企业,直到企业难以偿还债务,无论是新资本还是自由现金流。如果情况变得非常糟糕,贷款人可以控制业务。尽管这种情况并不常见,但我们经常会看到负债公司永久稀释股东,因为贷款人迫使他们以不良价格筹集资金。但是,通过取代稀释,对于需要资本以高回报率投资增长的企业来说,债务可以成为一个非常好的工具。考虑公司的债务水平的第一步是同时考虑其现金和债务。

What Is Royal Gold's Net Debt?

皇家金业的净负债是多少?

As you can see below, Royal Gold had US$146.2m of debt at March 2024, down from US$496.8m a year prior. However, it also had US$138.0m in cash, and so its net debt is US$8.24m.

如下所示,截至2024年3月,皇家黄金的债务为1.462亿美元,低于去年同期的4.968亿美元。但是,它也有1.38亿美元的现金,因此其净负债为824万美元。

big
NasdaqGS:RGLD Debt to Equity History July 29th 2024
纳斯达克GS: RGLD 债权与股本比率历史记录 2024 年 7 月 29 日

How Strong Is Royal Gold's Balance Sheet?

皇家金业的资产负债表有多强?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Royal Gold had liabilities of US$77.1m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$312.8m due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$138.0m and US$41.9m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$210.1m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

我们可以从最新的资产负债表中看出,皇家黄金在一年内到期的负债为7,710万美元,之后到期的负债为3.128亿美元。另一方面,它有1.38亿美元的现金和价值4190万美元的应收账款将在一年内到期。因此,其负债总额比其现金和短期应收账款的总和高出2.101亿美元。

Given Royal Gold has a market capitalization of US$8.88b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse. Carrying virtually no net debt, Royal Gold has a very light debt load indeed.

鉴于皇家黄金的市值为88.8亿美元,很难相信这些负债会构成很大的威胁。话虽如此,很明显,我们应该继续监控其资产负债表,以免情况恶化。皇家黄金几乎没有净负债,债务负担确实很轻。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

为了扩大公司相对于收益的负债规模,我们计算其净负债除以利息、税项、折旧和摊销前的收益(EBITDA),将其利息和税前收益(EBIT)除以利息支出(利息保障)。这样,我们既考虑债务的绝对数量,也考虑为债务支付的利率。

Royal Gold has very little debt (net of cash), and boasts a debt to EBITDA ratio of 0.018 and EBIT of 22.3 times the interest expense. Indeed relative to its earnings its debt load seems light as a feather. Royal Gold's EBIT was pretty flat over the last year, but that shouldn't be an issue given the it doesn't have a lot of debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Royal Gold can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

皇家金业的债务(扣除现金)很少,债务与息税折旧摊销前利润的比率为0.018,息税前利润是利息支出的22.3倍。事实上,相对于其收益,其债务负担似乎轻如鸿毛。去年,皇家金业的息税前利润相当持平,但鉴于它没有大量债务,这应该不是问题。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中学到的关于债务的知识最多。但最终,该业务的未来盈利能力将决定皇家金业能否随着时间的推移加强其资产负债表。因此,如果你想看看专业人士的想法,你可能会发现这份关于分析师利润预测的免费报告很有趣。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last three years, Royal Gold reported free cash flow worth 5.3% of its EBIT, which is really quite low. That limp level of cash conversion undermines its ability to manage and pay down debt.

最后,企业需要自由现金流来偿还债务;会计利润根本无法减少债务。因此,我们显然需要研究该息税前利润是否会带来相应的自由现金流。在过去三年中,皇家黄金公布的自由现金流占其息税前利润的5.3%,确实很低。这种低迷的现金转换水平削弱了其管理和偿还债务的能力。

Our View

我们的观点

The good news is that Royal Gold's demonstrated ability to cover its interest expense with its EBIT delights us like a fluffy puppy does a toddler. But we must concede we find its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow has the opposite effect. Looking at all the aforementioned factors together, it strikes us that Royal Gold can handle its debt fairly comfortably. Of course, while this leverage can enhance returns on equity, it does bring more risk, so it's worth keeping an eye on this one. Over time, share prices tend to follow earnings per share, so if you're interested in Royal Gold, you may well want to click here to check an interactive graph of its earnings per share history.

好消息是,Royal Gold表现出的用息税前利润支付利息支出的能力使我们感到高兴,就像毛茸茸的小狗对待幼儿一样。但是我们必须承认,我们发现其将息税前利润转换为自由现金流会产生相反的效果。综合上述所有因素,令我们震惊的是,皇家黄金能够相当轻松地处理债务。当然,尽管这种杠杆可以提高股本回报率,但它确实带来了更多的风险,因此值得关注。随着时间的推移,股价往往会跟随每股收益,因此,如果你对皇家黄金感兴趣,你很可能想点击这里查看其每股收益历史的互动图表。

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果你有兴趣投资能够在没有债务负担的情况下增加利润的企业,请查看这份资产负债表上有净现金的成长型企业的免费清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发