share_log

China Everbright Bank Company Limited's (SHSE:601818) Market Cap Dropped CN¥8.9b Last Week; Private Companies Bore the Brunt

China Everbright Bank Company Limited's (SHSE:601818) Market Cap Dropped CN¥8.9b Last Week; Private Companies Bore the Brunt

光大银行公司有限公司(SHSE:601818)上周市值减少89亿元人民币;私人企业承受了主要压力。
Simply Wall St ·  07/29 22:15

Key Insights

主要见解

  • China Everbright Bank's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 54% ownership
  • 17% of China Everbright Bank is held by Institutions
  • 中国光大银行的大量私人公司所有权表明,关键决策受到更大的公众股东的影响。
  • 该公司的多数股份由2位投资者持有,占有54%的所有权。
  • 中国光大银行有17%的机构持股。

Every investor in China Everbright Bank Company Limited (SHSE:601818) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 52% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

每位投资中国光大银行股份有限公司(SHSE: 601818)的投资者都应该意识到最强大股东群体。而持有最大饼图的群体是占有52%所有权的私人公司。换句话说,这个群体将从他们对公司的投资中获得最多(或者最少)的利益。

As a result, private companies as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥8.9b.

因此,私人公司作为一个群体,在市值下降了89亿元后,上周遭受了最大的损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of China Everbright Bank.

在下面的图表中,我们将放大中国光大银行的不同股权组。

big
SHSE:601818 Ownership Breakdown July 30th 2024
SHSE:601818股权结构 2024年7月30日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About China Everbright Bank?

机构投资者拥有相当数量的中国光大银行股份,这表明在专业投资者中具有一定的信誉度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时也会犯错误,就像每个人一样。有时如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价会大幅下跌,这并不罕见。因此,值得检查中国光大银行过去的收益轨迹(如下图)。当然,还需考虑其他因素。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in China Everbright Bank. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of China Everbright Bank, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

SHSE:601818收益和营业收入增长 2024年7月30日

big
SHSE:601818 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 30th 2024
中国光大银行不是由对冲基金拥有的。目前,中国光大集团有限公司是公司最大的股东,持有47%的流通股。持有流通股的第二大和第三大股东分别是中国华融资产管理股份有限公司、资产管理部和中国远洋运输(集团)有限公司,持股比例分别为7.1%和3.9%。

China Everbright Bank is not owned by hedge funds. China Everbright Group Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 47% of shares outstanding. With 7.1% and 3.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, China Huarong Asset Management Co., Ltd., Asset Management Arm and China COSCO Shipping Corporation Limited are the second and third largest shareholders.

中国光大银行的内部所有权情况 似乎私人公司拥有中国光大银行股票的52%。私人公司可能是关联方。有时内部人员通过在私人公司持有股权而不是以个人的身份拥有对上市公司的利益。虽然很难得出任何广泛的结论,但值得注意的是这是一项需要进一步研究的领域。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前2名股东拥有该公司的大部分所有权,这意味着他们足够强大,可以影响公司的决策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of China Everbright Bank

我觉得查看拥有一家公司的人真的很有趣。但实际上,为了获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。例如,考虑风险。每个公司都有自己的风险,我们已经发现了中国光大银行的1个警示信号,您应该知道。

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.

我们注意到我们的数据并没有显示任何董事会成员拥有股份。董事会成员至少拥有一些个人持仓是不寻常的,因此我们的数据可能有缺陷。下一步是检查CEO的薪酬水平。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 30% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公众,包括零售投资者,在公司中拥有30%的股份,因此不能轻易忽略。尽管这种所有权规模相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,则可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 52%, of the China Everbright Bank stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for China Everbright Bank you should know about.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发