share_log

ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (NYSE:ZTO) CEO Meisong Lai's Holdings Dropped 6.6% in Value as a Result of the Recent Pullback

ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (NYSE:ZTO) CEO Meisong Lai's Holdings Dropped 6.6% in Value as a Result of the Recent Pullback

中通快递(开曼)股份有限公司(纽交所:ZTO)CEO赖梅松的持股价值因最近回落而下降了6.6%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/30 06:27

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in ZTO Express (Cayman)'s growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
  • Institutions own 37% of ZTO Express (Cayman)
  • 从持有一定数量的股权来看,内部人员似乎对中通快递(开曼)有着浓厚的兴趣。
  • 前四大股东持有公司50%的股份。
  • 据我们了解,机构拥有中通快递(开曼)37%的股权。

If you want to know who really controls ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (NYSE:ZTO), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 40% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想了解究竟是谁掌控了中通快递(开曼)股份,您需要看看其股份登记册的构成。具体而言,个人内部人员拥有公司最多的股份,占据了40%的股权。也就是说,如果股票上涨了,他们将获得最大的益处(或者如果股票走低了,则将失去最多的股权)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 6.6%.

最近一周,该股票下跌了6.6%,内部人遭受了最大损失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about ZTO Express (Cayman).

让我们近距离看看不同类型的股东对中通快递(开曼)的意义。

big
NYSE:ZTO Ownership Breakdown July 30th 2024
2024年7月30日,纽交所中通快递(开曼)股权分布

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ZTO Express (Cayman)?

机构持股对中通快递(开曼)意味着什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

ZTO Express (Cayman) already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of ZTO Express (Cayman), (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

中通快递(开曼)的股份登记册已经有机构的身影。事实上,他们持有公司相当大的股份。这表明该公司在投资社区有着一定的信誉。然而,我们最好对依赖机构投资者的所谓鉴证持有一定的警惕性。因为他们也会做出错误的判断。如果两个大型机构投资者尝试同时卖出一只股票,股价下跌是很常见的。所以最好检查一下中通快递(开曼)的过去收益轨迹(如下图)。当然,也要考虑其他因素。

big
NYSE:ZTO Earnings and Revenue Growth July 30th 2024
2024年7月30日,纽交所中通快递(开曼)盈利和营业收入增长情况

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in ZTO Express (Cayman). Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Meisong Lai with 26% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.4% and 8.1% of the stock.

我们注意到,对于中通快递(开曼),对冲基金没有重大的投资。我们的数据显示,最大股东是董事长赖梅松,持有公司26%的流通股。相比之下,第二大和第三大股东持有的股票约占股票总数的8.4%和8.1%。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 50% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我们的研究也揭示了一个事实,即四大股东大约控制着公司的50%的股份,这表明这些所有者在业务中具有重要的影响力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究一个公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师预期增长也是有意义的,因为很多分析师都有关注这些股票,因此可以很容易地了解预期增长。

Insider Ownership Of ZTO Express (Cayman)

中通快递(开曼)的内部人员持股情况

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.. Insiders own US$6.1b worth of shares in the US$15b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我们最新的数据表明,内部人员持有中通快递(开曼)公司相当大比例的股份,高达61亿美元。这是相当有意义的。大多数人都会很高兴看到公司的董事会与他们一起投资。您可能想要查看此免费图表,以查看内部人员的最新交易情况。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

总体来说,公众股东,包括散户投资者,拥有该公司15%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这个群体不能完全掌控公司,但肯定对公司经营产生真正的影响。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

Public companies currently own 8.4% of ZTO Express (Cayman) stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

公共公司目前拥有中通快递(开曼)股票8.4%的持股。这可能是一种战略利益,这两家公司可能有相关的业务利益。可能是他们进行了分拆。这个持股可能值得进一步深入调查。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - ZTO Express (Cayman) has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

虽然考虑到所有拥有公司的各个群体都是有意义的,但更重要的因素还有其他因素。例如风险 - 中通快递(开曼)有一个警告信号,我们认为你应该意识到这一点。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发