Textron's (NYSE:TXT) Earnings Seem To Be Promising
Textron's (NYSE:TXT) Earnings Seem To Be Promising
The market seemed underwhelmed by last week's earnings announcement from Textron Inc. (NYSE:TXT) despite the healthy numbers. Our analysis suggests that shareholders might be missing some positive underlying factors in the earnings report.
尽管德事隆公司(纽交所:TXT)上周发布了健康数据,但市场似乎并不感到兴奋。我们的分析表明,股东们可能错过了财报中一些积极的潜在因素。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240730/0-ed4abcb0bae4cbb116b182c234a88833-0-1beaffb555ba7668a808d592cb606a03.png/big)
The Impact Of Unusual Items On Profit
除了稀释之外,还应该注意的是,万集科技在过去12个月中因不寻常项目获得了价值人民币3.5万元的利润。虽然我们希望看到利润增加,但当这些不寻常项目对利润做出重大贡献时,我们会更加谨慎。我们对全球大部分上市公司的数据进行了分析,发现不寻常项目往往是一次性的。这正如我们所期望的那样,因为这些提升被描述为"不寻常"。相对于其利润而言,万集科技在2021年12月前的不寻常项目贡献大。因此,我们可以推断出,这些不寻常项目正在使其财务利润显著增强。
To properly understand Textron's profit results, we need to consider the US$153m expense attributed to unusual items. It's never great to see unusual items costing the company profits, but on the upside, things might improve sooner rather than later. When we analysed the vast majority of listed companies worldwide, we found that significant unusual items are often not repeated. And that's hardly a surprise given these line items are considered unusual. Assuming those unusual expenses don't come up again, we'd therefore expect Textron to produce a higher profit next year, all else being equal.
为了正确理解德事隆的盈利结果,我们需要考虑其中1.53亿美元的飞凡成本。虽然看到飞凡成本损害公司利润并非理想,但从另一方面来看,事情可能很快会有所改善。当我们分析了全球大多数上市公司时,发现其它多数不正常事项往往不会重复。而这并不令人惊讶,因为这些项目被认为是不寻常的。因此,假设这些不正常的支出不再出现,我们预计德事隆在其他相等条件下明年将产生更高的利润。
That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.
这可能会让您想知道分析师对未来盈利能力的预测。幸运的是,您可以单击此处查看基于其估计的未来盈利能力的互动图表。
Our Take On Textron's Profit Performance
我们对德事隆的盈利表现的看法
Unusual items (expenses) detracted from Textron's earnings over the last year, but we might see an improvement next year. Because of this, we think Textron's earnings potential is at least as good as it seems, and maybe even better! And the EPS is up 57% annually, over the last three years. Of course, we've only just scratched the surface when it comes to analysing its earnings; one could also consider margins, forecast growth, and return on investment, among other factors. If you want to do dive deeper into Textron, you'd also look into what risks it is currently facing. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Textron you should be aware of.
过去一年中,飞凡费用削弱了德事隆的收益,但是我们可能会看到改进。由此,我们认为德事隆的盈利潜力至少与看起来一样好,甚至更好!每股收益每年增长57%,在过去三年中。当然,在分析其盈利方面时,我们刚刚触及表面; 还可以考虑利润率,预测增长以及投资回报率等其他因素。如果你想深入了解德事隆,你也可以了解它当前面临的风险。警告:我们已经发现德事隆有1个警告信号,你应该注意。
Today we've zoomed in on a single data point to better understand the nature of Textron's profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful.
今天,我们放大了一个单独的数据点,以更好地理解德事隆利润的性质。但是还有很多其他方法来了解公司的情况。例如,许多人认为高股本回报率是良好商业经济的指标,而其他人则喜欢“追随资金”并搜寻内部人购买的股票。虽然这可能需要你的一些研究,但你可能会发现这个免费的高股本回报率公司收藏集或带有显着内部持股的股票列表非常有用。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。