Individual Investors Own 40% of Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600754) Shares but Private Companies Control 45% of the Company
Individual Investors Own 40% of Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600754) Shares but Private Companies Control 45% of the Company
Key Insights
主要见解
- Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels' significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- 15% of Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels is held by Institutions
- 上海锦江国际酒店的重要私营公司所有权表明,关键决策受到大众股东的影响。
- 共有5位投资者拥有该公司的多数股份,持股比例为50%。
- 上海锦江国际酒店15%的股份由机构持有。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600754), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 45% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
为了了解上海锦江国际酒店股份有限公司(SHSE:600754)真正的控制人,了解公司的所有权结构非常重要。持有最大股份的是占45%的私人公司。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将获益最大(或者在经济衰退时损失最大)。
And individual investors on the other hand have a 40% ownership in the company.
而个人投资者则持有该公司的40%股份。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels.
在下图中,我们放大了上海锦江国际酒店的不同所有权群体。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240731/0-655b7e70cbaba943f0a1b67b6c0a6091-0-3e4e834f85e5061167e4ab9fa2cf8782.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels?
机构所有权告诉我们关于上海锦江国际酒店的什么?上海锦江国际酒店已经有机构股东。实际上,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。但最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所提供的所谓验证。他们也会有错误。如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图卖出股票,往往会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查上海锦江国际酒店的过去收益轨迹(下面)。当然,也要记住还有其他要考虑的因素。
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
上海锦江国际酒店已经有机构股东。实际上,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。但最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所提供的所谓验证。他们也会有错误。如果两家大型机构投资者同时试图卖出股票,往往会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查上海锦江国际酒店的过去收益轨迹(下面)。当然,也要记住还有其他要考虑的因素。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240731/0-655b7e70cbaba943f0a1b67b6c0a6091-1-8e53e585e10e4888e277350c159f7d00.png/big)
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels. Our data shows that Jinjiang International Holdings Co.,Ltd is the largest shareholder with 45% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 1.5% and 1.4% of the stock.
对于上海锦江国际酒店,对冲基金并没有持有很多股份。我们的数据显示,锦江国际控股有限公司是持有45%流通股份的最大股东。相比之下,第二大和第三大股东持有约1.5%和1.4%的股份。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前5位股东控制了该公司超过一半的股份,这意味着该组人对公司的决策具有相当大的影响力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels
上海锦江国际酒店的内部所有权我们的数据表明,内部人以自己的名字拥有上海锦江国际酒店股份有限公司不到1%的股份。但他们可能通过我们没有察觉到的公司结构具有间接利益。这是一家相当大的公司,所以董事会成员可能拥有公司中有意义的利益,而不必拥有成比例的利益。在这种情况下,他们持有价值约220万人民币的股份(按当前价格计算)。可以点击这里查看最近的买卖情况。
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels Co., Ltd. in their own names. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around CN¥2.2m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
普通公众,通常是个人投资者,持有上海锦江国际酒店40%的股份。虽然这个群体不一定能掌控局面,但它肯定会对公司的运营产生真正的影响。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 40% stake in Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
始终考虑拥有公司股份的不同群体是值得的。但为了更好地了解上海锦江国际酒店,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。为此,您应该知道我们发现的2个警告信号与上海锦江国际酒店有关。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 45%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
思考拥有公司股份的不同机构总是值得的。但要更好地了解华峰化学有限公司,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如:我们已经发现华峰化学有限公司的1个警示信号,你需要了解。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels .
始终考虑拥有公司股份的不同群体是值得的。但为了更好地了解上海锦江国际酒店,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。为此,您应该知道我们发现的2个警告信号与上海锦江国际酒店有关。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。