share_log

Cadence Design Systems' (NASDAQ:CDNS) Promising Earnings May Rest On Soft Foundations

Cadence Design Systems' (NASDAQ:CDNS) Promising Earnings May Rest On Soft Foundations

铿腾电子(纳斯达克股票代码:CDNS)的前景看好的盈利可能建立在软基础之上。
Simply Wall St ·  07/31 06:11

Last week's profit announcement from Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:CDNS) was underwhelming for investors, despite headline numbers being robust. Our analysis uncovered some concerning factors that we believe the market might be paying attention to.

尽管头条数字表现强劲,但铿腾电子公司(纳斯达克:CDNS)上周公布的利润数据令投资者感到失望。我们的分析揭示了一些令人担忧的因素,我们认为市场可能正在关注这些因素。

big
NasdaqGS:CDNS Earnings and Revenue History July 31st 2024
NASDAQ:CDNS历史数据:财报和营收,日期为2024年7月31日。

The Impact Of Unusual Items On Profit

除了稀释之外,还应该注意的是,万集科技在过去12个月中因不寻常项目获得了价值人民币3.5万元的利润。虽然我们希望看到利润增加,但当这些不寻常项目对利润做出重大贡献时,我们会更加谨慎。我们对全球大部分上市公司的数据进行了分析,发现不寻常项目往往是一次性的。这正如我们所期望的那样,因为这些提升被描述为"不寻常"。相对于其利润而言,万集科技在2021年12月前的不寻常项目贡献大。因此,我们可以推断出,这些不寻常项目正在使其财务利润显著增强。

Importantly, our data indicates that Cadence Design Systems' profit received a boost of US$86m in unusual items, over the last year. We can't deny that higher profits generally leave us optimistic, but we'd prefer it if the profit were to be sustainable. When we crunched the numbers on thousands of publicly listed companies, we found that a boost from unusual items in a given year is often not repeated the next year. Which is hardly surprising, given the name. If Cadence Design Systems doesn't see that contribution repeat, then all else being equal we'd expect its profit to drop over the current year.

重要的是,我们的数据显示,在过去一年中,铿腾电子公司(Cadence Design Systems)的利润因飞凡的因素获得了8600万美元的提振。我们不能否认,更高的利润通常让我们感到乐观,但我们更希望利润能够持续。当我们在成千上万家上市公司的数据上进行分析时,我们发现,在某一年中由于飞凡因素获得的提振通常不会在下一年重复。这并不奇怪,鉴于其命名。如果铿腾电子公司没有看到这种贡献的重复,则其他条件不变,我们预计其利润在当前年份会下降。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

这可能会让您想知道分析师对未来盈利能力的预测。幸运的是,您可以单击此处查看基于其估计的未来盈利能力的互动图表。

Our Take On Cadence Design Systems' Profit Performance

我们对铿腾电子公司(Cadence Design Systems)的利润表现看法是:

We'd posit that Cadence Design Systems' statutory earnings aren't a clean read on ongoing productivity, due to the large unusual item. Because of this, we think that it may be that Cadence Design Systems' statutory profits are better than its underlying earnings power. But at least holders can take some solace from the 58% per annum growth in EPS for the last three. Of course, we've only just scratched the surface when it comes to analysing its earnings; one could also consider margins, forecast growth, and return on investment, among other factors. Ultimately, this article has formed an opinion based on historical data. However, it can also be great to think about what analysts are forecasting for the future. Luckily, you can check out what analysts are forecasting by clicking here.

我们认为铿腾电子公司的法定盈利不是对持续生产力的准确反映,因为存在大量飞凡因素。正因如此,我们认为,铿腾电子公司的法定利润可能比其潜在盈利能力更好。但至少持有人可以从过去三年每股收益年增长58%中获得一些安慰。当然,当涉及其收益时,我们还只是触及了表面,人们还可以考虑利润率、预测增长和投资回报率等因素。最终,本文基于历史数据形成了观点。不过,思考分析师对未来的预测也可以很有意义。幸运的是,您可以点击此处查看分析师预测。

This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of Cadence Design Systems' profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.

本文只考虑了影响铿腾电子公司利润性质的单一因素。但还有很多其他方法可以了解公司。例如,许多人认为高净资产回报率是有利的商业经济指标,而其他人喜欢“跟着钱走”,寻找内部人员正在购买的股票。因此,您可能希望查看这些公司的高净资产回报率、或这些具有高内部持股比例的股票的免费汇总。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发