Retail Investors in Shanghai Haixin Group Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600851) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 7.1% Last Week
Retail Investors in Shanghai Haixin Group Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600851) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 7.1% Last Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- The considerable ownership by retail investors in Shanghai Haixin Group indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 47% ownership
- 19% of Shanghai Haixin Group is held by Institutions
- 上海海欣集团零售投资者持有大量股份,这意味着他们在公司的管理和业务策略方面拥有更大的发言权。
- 25位投资者拥有华力创通的多数股份,占有47%的所有权。
- 机构持有上海海欣集团19%的股份。
A look at the shareholders of Shanghai Haixin Group Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600851) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 53% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
观察上海海欣集团股份的股东可以告诉我们哪个团体最为强大。我们可以看到,零售投资者拥有该公司53%的股权,换句话说,该团体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
As a result, retail investors were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 7.1% gain.
因此,零售投资者是上周7.1%收益的最大受益者。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shanghai Haixin Group, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究上海海欣集团的每种所有人类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Haixin Group?
机构所有权告诉我们上海海欣集团的什么情况?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
We can see that Shanghai Haixin Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shanghai Haixin Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到,上海海欣集团确实拥有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司的很大一部分股票。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师们已经研究了这只股票,并且喜欢它。但和其他人一样,他们也可能是错误的。如果两个大型机构投资者尝试同时抛售一只股票,往往会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得注意的是查看上海海欣集团的过去业绩轨迹(如下所示)。当然,也要记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shanghai Haixin Group. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Hunan Ningrui Investment Partnership Enterprise (Limited Partnership) with 12% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.8% and 5.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
对于上海海欣集团而言,对冲基金持有的股份并不多。从我们的数据来看,持有该公司最多股份的是湖南宁瑞投资合伙企业(有限合伙),持股比例为12%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有6.8%和5.0%的股份。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我们的研究表明,前25大股东共控制了公司股份的不到一半,这意味着公司的股份广泛分散,没有主导股东。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
尽管我们需要研究一个公司的机构所有权数据是有道理的,但也需要研究分析师的情绪来了解市场趋势。我们目前没有发现任何关于该股票的分析师报道,所以该公司可能不受广泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Haixin Group
上海海欣集团股东内部情况。
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Shanghai Haixin Group Co., Ltd.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own CN¥103m worth of the CN¥4.3b company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们最近的数据表明内部人员拥有上海海欣集团有限公司的一些股份,作为个人,内部人员共同拥有价值1,030万元人民币的该43亿元公司的股份。有人认为这显示了股东和董事会之间的利益一致性,但也值得检查这些内部人员是否一直在抛售股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 53% stake in Shanghai Haixin Group, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
一般公众——通常是个体投资者——持有上海海欣集团的重要53%,这意味着它是相当受欢迎的股票。这种所有权水平使来自更广泛公众的投资者获得了一些权力,以影响关键政策决策,如董事会组成,高管薪酬和股利支付比率。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 24%, of the Shanghai Haixin Group stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
似乎私人公司持有上海海欣集团24%的股份。私人公司可能是关联方,有时内部人员通过持有私人公司的股份而对一家公共公司产生兴趣,而不是以个人的身份进行投资。虽然很难得出任何广泛的结论,但值得注意的是作为进一步研究的领域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Shanghai Haixin Group you should be aware of.
虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同团体很有价值,但还有其他更重要的因素。实测:我们发现上海海欣集团存在1个警示迹象,你应该知道。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜欢核对具有潜在优越财务状况的其他公司,则不要错过此免费的备有强大财务数据支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。