share_log

Wilmar International (SGX:F34) Shareholders Have Endured a 20% Loss From Investing in the Stock Three Years Ago

Wilmar International (SGX:F34) Shareholders Have Endured a 20% Loss From Investing in the Stock Three Years Ago

Wilmar International(新加坡交易所:F34)的股东在三年前的投资中遭受了20%的损失。
Simply Wall St ·  07/31 19:52

Many investors define successful investing as beating the market average over the long term. But its virtually certain that sometimes you will buy stocks that fall short of the market average returns. We regret to report that long term Wilmar International Limited (SGX:F34) shareholders have had that experience, with the share price dropping 30% in three years, versus a market decline of about 13%.

许多投资者认为,在长期内打败市场平均水平是成功的投资。但是几乎可以肯定的是,有时您会购买的股票表现不及市场平均回报。我们遗憾地报告,新加坡交易所上的威廉国际有限公司(SGX:F34)的长期股东正在经历这种经历,股价在三年内下跌了30%,而市场下降了约13%。

So let's have a look and see if the longer term performance of the company has been in line with the underlying business' progress.

那么我们来看看这家公司的长期表现是否符合其业务进展情况。

To paraphrase Benjamin Graham: Over the short term the market is a voting machine, but over the long term it's a weighing machine. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

引用本杰明·格雷厄姆的话:短期内市场是一个投票机,但长期来看它是一个称重机。评估公司周边环境的情绪变化的一种有缺陷但合理的方法是将每股收益(EPS)与股价进行比较。

Although the share price is down over three years, Wilmar International actually managed to grow EPS by 0.4% per year in that time. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Alternatively, growth expectations may have been unreasonable in the past.

虽然威廉国际的股价在三年内下跌了,但其EPS在此期间实际上增长了0.4%。考虑到股价的反应,人们可能会怀疑EPS在此期间并不是业务表现的良好指南(可能是由于一次性损失或收益),或者过去的增长预期可能是不合理的。

After considering the numbers, we'd posit that the the market had higher expectations of EPS growth, three years back. However, taking a look at other business metrics might shed a bit more light on the share price action.

在考虑了有关数字之后,我们认为市场对EPS增长的预期在三年前更高。但是,查看其他业务指标可能会更加了解股价行情。

Given the healthiness of the dividend payments, we doubt that they've concerned the market. We like that Wilmar International has actually grown its revenue over the last three years. If the company can keep growing revenue, there may be an opportunity for investors. You might have to dig deeper to understand the recent share price weakness.

考虑到分红派息的健康状况,我们怀疑他们没有引起市场的关注。我们喜欢威廉国际在过去三年中实际上增长了营业收入。如果公司能够继续增长营业收入,投资者就有机会。您可能需要深入挖掘,了解最近股价疲软的原因。

You can see how earnings and revenue have changed over time in the image below (click on the chart to see the exact values).

你可以在下面的图片中看到收入和营业收入随时间的变化情况(单击图表可查看精确值)。

big
SGX:F34 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 31st 2024
SGX:F34的收益和营收增长于2024年7月31日

It's good to see that there was some significant insider buying in the last three months. That's a positive. That said, we think earnings and revenue growth trends are even more important factors to consider. This free report showing analyst forecasts should help you form a view on Wilmar International

看到上个季度有些重要的内部买入是好事。尽管如此,我们认为盈利和营收增长趋势更加重要。此免费报告显示分析师预测,应该能帮助您形成有关威廉国际的观点。

What About Dividends?

那么分红怎么样呢?

It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. We note that for Wilmar International the TSR over the last 3 years was -20%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. This is largely a result of its dividend payments!

考虑到任何给定股票的总股东回报率以及股价回报率都很重要。TSR是一种回报计算,考虑到现金股息的价值(假设任何收到的股息都已被再投资),以及任何折价融资和分拆的计算价值。因此,对于支付丰厚股息的公司,TSR通常比股价回报率高得多。我们注意到,对于威廉国际,过去3年的TSR为-20%,比上述股价回报率要好。这在很大程度上是其分红派息的结果!

A Different Perspective

不同的观点

While the broader market gained around 3.8% in the last year, Wilmar International shareholders lost 13% (even including dividends). Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Regrettably, last year's performance caps off a bad run, with the shareholders facing a total loss of 0.6% per year over five years. We realise that Baron Rothschild has said investors should "buy when there is blood on the streets", but we caution that investors should first be sure they are buying a high quality business. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Wilmar International better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Wilmar International (at least 1 which is a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

尽管包括股息在内,更大范围的市场在去年赚到了约3.8%,但威廉国际的股东却亏了13%。即使好的股票股价有时也会下跌,但我们希望在感兴趣之前先改善企业的基本指标。遗憾的是,去年的表现结束了一段糟糕的运行,股东在过去五年中每年面临着总损失0.6%。我们意识到巴伦·罗斯柴尔德曾说过,投资者应该在“大街上有血时买入”,但我们警告投资者首先必须确信他们正在购买高质量的企业。追踪长期的股价表现总是很有趣的。但是要更好地了解威廉国际,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,时刻存在的投资风险。我们已经确定了威廉国际的3个警告信号(至少有1个有些不愉快),了解这些信号应该是您投资过程的一部分。

If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: most of them are flying under the radar).

如果您喜欢与管理层共同购买股票,那么您可能会喜欢这个免费的公司列表(提示:大多数公司没有受到关注)。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Singaporean exchanges.

请注意,本文中引用的市场回报反映了当前在新加坡交易所上市股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发