share_log

Insiders Were the Key Beneficiaries as Inly Media Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603598) Market Cap Rises to CN¥3.5b

Insiders Were the Key Beneficiaries as Inly Media Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603598) Market Cap Rises to CN¥3.5b

随着引力传媒股份有限公司(SHSE:603598)的市值上升至35亿元人民币,内部人成为了主要受益者
Simply Wall St ·  08/01 02:41

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Inly Media's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 内部人似乎对引力传媒的增长有着切实的利益,这可以从他们的大量股权持有来看。
  • 前3大股东持有50%的业务。
  • 通过公司过去的业绩数据和股权研究,人们可以更好地评估一家公司的未来表现。

If you want to know who really controls Inly Media Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603598), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 43% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道真正控制引力传媒股份有限公司(SHSE:603598)的人,那么您就必须查看其股权登记簿的构成。我们可以看到,个人内部人员拥有该公司的绝大部分股权,持股比例达43%。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 14% gain.

因此,内部人士是上周14%收益最大的受益者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Inly Media, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入研究引力传媒的每一种所有者,从下面的图表开始。

big
SHSE:603598 Ownership Breakdown August 1st 2024
SHSE:603598所有权构成2024年8月1日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Inly Media?

机构持股告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

We can see that Inly Media does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Inly Media, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我们可以看到,引力传媒确实拥有机构投资者,他们持有公司股份的一部分。这表明在专业投资者中享有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像其他人一样犯错误。如果两位大型机构投资者同时尝试抛售一支股票,股价大幅下跌就很常见。因此,值得检查下面的引力传媒过去的收益轨迹。当然,还要记住还有其他因素要考虑。

big
SHSE:603598 Earnings and Revenue Growth August 1st 2024
SHSE:603598收入和营业收入增长2024年8月1日

Inly Media is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Yan Ji Luo with 37% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.5% and 5.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

引力传媒没有被对冲基金所持有。查看我们的数据,我们可以看到最大的股东是罗彦吉,持有37%的流通股。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有流通股的7.5%和5.6%。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

总的来说,包括散户投资者在内,公众拥有公司的14%的股份,因此不能轻易忽视。尽管这种所有权的规模可能不足以在他们的利益方面影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

南京证券复合材料公司内部所有权情况

Insider Ownership Of Inly Media

内部人持有引力传媒的股权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Inly Media Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥1.5b worth of shares in the CN¥3.5b company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,内部人在引力传媒股份有限公司中拥有重要股权。内部人在总市值为35亿的公司中拥有价值15亿元人民币的股票。这可能表明创始人仍拥有很多股份。您可以单击此处查看他们是否一直在买卖。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 42% stake in Inly Media. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公众,通常是个体投资者,在引力传媒中持有42%的股份。虽然这种持股规模可能不足以影响政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 7.5%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们的数据显示,私人公司持有本公司7.5%的股份。单凭这个事实难以得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人员或其他相关方可能通过单独的私人公司持有上市公司的股权。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Inly Media has 3 warning signs (and 1 which doesn't sit too well with us) we think you should know about.

虽然考虑不同的公司所有者群体非常值得,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如风险 - 引力传媒有3个警告标志(以及1个我们认为不太好的标志),我们认为您应该知道。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

当然,您可能会在其他地方找到一项出色的投资。因此,请查看此免费的有趣公司列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发