Shanghai STEP Electric Corporation's (SZSE:002527) 12% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Individual Investors Who Own 56% as Well as Insiders
Shanghai STEP Electric Corporation's (SZSE:002527) 12% Gain Last Week Benefited Both Individual Investors Who Own 56% as Well as Insiders
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over Shanghai STEP Electric by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 44% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Insider ownership in Shanghai STEP Electric is 41%
- 个人投资者对上海新时达电器有着重大的控制权,这意味着普通公众在影响管理和治理决策方面拥有更多的权力。
- 前25个股东持有44%的业务。
- 上海新时达电器的内部所有权占41%。
If you want to know who really controls Shanghai STEP Electric Corporation (SZSE:002527), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 56% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想知道谁真正控制着上海新时达电器股份有限公司(SZSE:002527)的话,那么您将必须查看其股权登记簿的构成。个人投资者拥有该公司的最大股份,占56%。换句话说,该组织将从其对该公司的投资中获得最大的收益(或损失最大)。
While individual investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's CN¥438m market cap gain, insiders too had a 41% share in those profits.
尽管个人投资者是上周CN¥ 43800万市值增长中受益最多的群体,但内部人士也获得了其中的41%股份。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shanghai STEP Electric, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入探讨上海新时达电器的每一类所有者,从下面的图表开始。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240801/0-ed0667976d25787a89ee2fa8fdf9fd97-0-762a445de2a07fdc595630b834dcf1da.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai STEP Electric?
机构投资者持有上海新时达电器的比例较小,因此许多人可能没有花费太多时间考虑这只股票。但很明显有些人投资了这只股票,并且他们对此表示喜欢。因此,如果该公司本身能够随着时间的推移得到改进,我们很可能会在未来看到更多的机构买家。当多个机构投资者希望购买股票时,我们通常会看到股价上涨。过去的营业收入轨迹(如下图所示)可以是未来增长的指示,但并不能保证未来一定如此。
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
Since institutions own only a small portion of Shanghai STEP Electric, many may not have spent much time considering the stock. But it's clear that some have; and they liked it enough to buy in. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.
SZSE:002527盈利和营收增长 2024年8月1日
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240801/0-ed0667976d25787a89ee2fa8fdf9fd97-1-63486854f758489a0a4b6460f70457df.png/big)
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shanghai STEP Electric. Defa Ji is currently the company's largest shareholder with 24% of shares outstanding. With 5.4% and 4.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, Yi Ji and Zhongmin Yuan are the second and third largest shareholders.
上述数据显示内部人士拥有上海新时达电器股份有限公司的合理比例。内部人士在这家41亿元的公司中持有17亿元的股份。这可能表明公司的创始人仍然拥有很多股份。您可以点击此处查看他们是否一直在买入或卖出。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我们的研究表明,前25大股东共控制了公司股份的不到一半,这意味着公司的股份广泛分散,没有主导股东。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
普通公众持有北方铜业的23%股份。虽然这个群体不能决定公司的命运,但它肯定会对公司运营方式产生真正的影响。
Insider Ownership Of Shanghai STEP Electric
普通公众——包括散户投资者——拥有上海新时达电器56%的股份。这种所有权水平使得广大公众的投资者在影响重要的政策决策,比如董事会组成、高管薪酬和股息支付比率等方面拥有一定的权力。
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Shanghai STEP Electric Corporation. Insiders have a CN¥1.7b stake in this CN¥4.1b business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是非常值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如风险。每家公司都有风险,我们已经发现了上海新时达电器的1个警告信号,您应该了解。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 56% of Shanghai STEP Electric. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
阅读完这篇文章之后,我们希望您现在对上海新时达电器有了更好的了解。信息透明度很重要,您应该通过充分了解公司的内部所有权和其他风险因素来做出自己的投资决策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Shanghai STEP Electric you should know about.
当然,在您决定买入或卖出上海新时达电器的股票之前,您首先需要知道它的价值。有许多因素可以影响公司的未来增长,因此如果您有兴趣了解更多信息,请查看该公司的其他基本数据。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜欢核对具有潜在优越财务状况的其他公司,则不要错过此免费的备有强大财务数据支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。