share_log

With 65% Ownership of the Shares, Kinder Morgan, Inc. (NYSE:KMI) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 65% Ownership of the Shares, Kinder Morgan, Inc. (NYSE:KMI) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

拥有65%股权的Kinder Morgan公司(NYSE:KMI)受机构投资者严重控制。
Simply Wall St ·  08/01 06:51

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Kinder Morgan's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 22 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 机构大量持有金德尔摩根的股份,这意味着他们的交易行为会对股价产生影响。
  • 22家最大的股东持有该企业的50%股权。
  • 近期内有内部人士出售股票

If you want to know who really controls Kinder Morgan, Inc. (NYSE:KMI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 65% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想知道谁真正控制金德尔摩根公司 (纽交所: KMI),那么您需要看一下其股权登记簿的组成。拥有该公司最多股份的集团——确切地说是约 65% 的机构——是该公司的主要持股者。换句话说,这个集团所获得的 (或失去的) 收益是最大的。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由于他们拥有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构所有权往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者来说。因此,拥有大量机构资金投资于公司往往被认为是一种令人向往的品质。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Kinder Morgan, beginning with the chart below.

接下来,我们将深入探讨金德尔摩根的每一种股东类型,首先从下面的图表开始。

big
NYSE:KMI Ownership Breakdown August 1st 2024
纽交所: KMI 持股比例拆分 (截至 2024 年 8 月 1 日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Kinder Morgan?

机构持股给我们关于Kinder Morgan的什么信息?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Kinder Morgan. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Kinder Morgan's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,机构投资者在金德尔摩根拥有相当数量的股份。这可能意味着该公司在投资社区中有一定的信誉度。然而,最好还是谨慎地依赖所谓的机构投资者认可。他们有时也会犯错误。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,股价可能会迅速下跌。因此,值得注意金德尔摩根的收入历史如下图所示。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:KMI Earnings and Revenue Growth August 1st 2024
纽交所: KMI 收入和营业收入增长情况 (截至 2024 年 8 月 1 日)

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Kinder Morgan. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Kinder Morgan's case, its Top Key Executive, Richard Kinder, is the largest shareholder, holding 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.8% by the third-largest shareholder.

由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股份,董事会可能需要注意他们的偏好。对于金德尔摩根来说,其最大持股者是该公司最高负责人理查德 · 金德,他持有公司发行股份的 12%。作为参考,第二大股东持有约 9.0% 的发行股份,第三大股东持有约 6.8% 的发行股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 22 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过更多的研究,我们发现前22家公司合共占有50%的股份,这表明没有单一的股东对公司有重大控制。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究一个公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师预期增长也是有意义的,因为很多分析师都有关注这些股票,因此可以很容易地了解预期增长。

Insider Ownership Of Kinder Morgan

Kinder Morgan的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Kinder Morgan, Inc.. Insiders own US$5.9b worth of shares in the US$47b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我们最新的数据表明内部人员持有金德尔摩根公司相当比例的股份。内部人员持有这家美元 470 亿市值公司价值 5.9 亿美元的股份。这相当有意义。大多数人会很高兴看到董事会与他们一样进行投资。您可能希望访问这个免费的图表,以了解内部人员最近的交易情况。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公众——包括零售投资者——持有该公司22%的股份,因此不容易被忽视。虽然持有量相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,则可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Kinder Morgan better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Kinder Morgan that you should be aware of before investing here.

考虑到公司股权情况的不同组,总是值得思考的。但如果想更好地了解金德尔摩根,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们发现金德尔摩根存在 2 个警示信号,您应该在投资该公司之前了解这些信号。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发