share_log

Impressive Earnings May Not Tell The Whole Story For GE Vernova (NYSE:GEV)

Impressive Earnings May Not Tell The Whole Story For GE Vernova (NYSE:GEV)

对于GE Vernova(纽交所:GEV),令人印象深刻的收益可能无法讲述整个故事
Simply Wall St ·  08/01 06:53

Despite posting some strong earnings, the market for GE Vernova Inc.'s (NYSE:GEV) stock hasn't moved much. We did some digging, and we found some concerning factors in the details.

尽管GE Vernova Inc.(纽交所:GEV)发布了一些强劲的收益报告,但其股票市场动态并未有太大变化。我们进行了一些调查,并在细节中发现了一些令人担忧的因素。

big
NYSE:GEV Earnings and Revenue History August 1st 2024
纽交所:GEV 的收益和营业收入历史(2024年8月1日)

Zooming In On GE Vernova's Earnings

深入研究 GE Vernova 的收益

In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). The accrual ratio subtracts the FCF from the profit for a given period, and divides the result by the average operating assets of the company over that time. You could think of the accrual ratio from cashflow as the 'non-FCF profit ratio'.

在高级财务中,用来衡量公司将报告的利润转换为自由现金流(FCF)的主要比率是应计比率(来自现金流量表)。该应计比率从给定期间的FCF中减去利润,并将结果除以该时间段内公司的平均营运资产。你可以将应计比率从现金流量表视为“非自由现金流利润比率”。

As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. That's because some academic studies have suggested that high accruals ratios tend to lead to lower profit or less profit growth.

因此,负的应计比率对公司是有利的,而正的应计比率则会产生负面影响。虽然正的应计比率不是问题,因为它表示某种程度的非现金利润,但高的应计比率可能是一件坏事,因为它表明纸面利润与现金流不匹配。这是因为一些学术研究表明,高的应计比率往往会导致利润降低或利润增长较少。

Over the twelve months to June 2024, GE Vernova recorded an accrual ratio of -0.11. Therefore, its statutory earnings were quite a lot less than its free cashflow. To wit, it produced free cash flow of US$1.9b during the period, dwarfing its reported profit of US$1.19b. Notably, GE Vernova had negative free cash flow last year, so the US$1.9b it produced this year was a welcome improvement. However, that's not all there is to consider. We can see that unusual items have impacted its statutory profit, and therefore the accrual ratio.

在2023年6月的十二个月内,GE Vernova 的应计比率为-0.11。因此,它的法定收益比其自由现金流要少得多。换句话说,它在该时期内产生了19亿美元的自由现金流,远远超过了其报告的11.9亿美元利润。值得注意的是,去年 GE Vernova 的自由现金流是负的,因此它在今年产生的19亿美元是一个令人欣喜的改善。然而,这并不是所有需要考虑的事情。我们可以看到,不寻常的项目影响了其法定利润,因此也影响了应计比率。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

这可能会让您想知道分析师对未来盈利能力的预测。幸运的是,您可以单击此处查看基于其估计的未来盈利能力的互动图表。

How Do Unusual Items Influence Profit?

非常规项目如何影响利润?

Surprisingly, given GE Vernova's accrual ratio implied strong cash conversion, its paper profit was actually boosted by US$572m in unusual items. While it's always nice to have higher profit, a large contribution from unusual items sometimes dampens our enthusiasm. When we crunched the numbers on thousands of publicly listed companies, we found that a boost from unusual items in a given year is often not repeated the next year. And, after all, that's exactly what the accounting terminology implies. GE Vernova had a rather significant contribution from unusual items relative to its profit to June 2024. All else being equal, this would likely have the effect of making the statutory profit a poor guide to underlying earnings power.

令人惊讶的是,鉴于 GE Vernova 的应计比率意味着强大的现金转换,其纸面利润实际上受到了5720万美元的不寻常项目的提振。虽然总是有更高的利润是好的,但在某些情况下,不寻常项目的大量贡献有时会消减我们的热情。当我们对数以千计的上市公司进行数据分析时,我们发现,一年中不寻常项目的提升通常不会在下一年重复出现。而且毕竟,这正是会计术语所暗示的。 GE Vernova 相对于其截止2024年6月的利润而言,不寻常项目的贡献相当显著。如果一切保持不变,这可能会导致法定利润成为衡量基础收益能力的劣质指标。

Our Take On GE Vernova's Profit Performance

总的来说,GE Vernova 的应计比率表明其法定收益质量良好,但另一方面,利润受到了不寻常项目的提振。基于这些因素,我们认为 GE Vernova 的法定利润不太可能让它看起来比它实际上更弱。如果您想深入了解 GE Vernova,您还可以了解它目前面临的风险。例如:我们发现 GE Vernova 存在一个警示信号,您应该知道。

In conclusion, GE Vernova's accrual ratio suggests its statutory earnings are of good quality, but on the other hand the profits were boosted by unusual items. Based on these factors, we think it's very unlikely that GE Vernova's statutory profits make it seem much weaker than it is. If you want to do dive deeper into GE Vernova, you'd also look into what risks it is currently facing. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for GE Vernova you should be aware of.

总之,GE Vernova 的应计比率表明其法定收益质量良好,但另一方面,利润受到了不寻常项目的提振。基于这些因素,我们认为 GE Vernova 的法定利润不太可能让它看起来比它实际上更弱。如果您想深入了解 GE Vernova,您还可以了解它目前面临的风险。例如:我们发现 GE Vernova 存在一个警示信号,您应该知道。

Our examination of GE Vernova has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful.

我们对 GE Vernova 的检查聚焦于可能使其收益看起来比实际上更好的某些因素。但是,有很多其他方法可以了解一家公司,例如一些人认为高股本回报是高质量企业的好迹象。虽然您可能需要一些研究,但您可能会发现这个免费的公司收益高、这个持股人显著的股票列表或这个股票列表会非常有用。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发