share_log

ICO Group's (HKG:1460) Earnings May Just Be The Starting Point

ICO Group's (HKG:1460) Earnings May Just Be The Starting Point

扬科集团(HKG:1460)的收益可能只是起点
Simply Wall St ·  08/01 18:59

The subdued stock price reaction suggests that ICO Group Limited's (HKG:1460) strong earnings didn't offer any surprises. Investors are probably missing some underlying factors which are encouraging for the future of the company.

ICO Group(HKG:1460)股价反应不够明显,这表明其强劲的收益没有提供任何惊喜。投资者可能错过了一些为公司未来鼓舞士气的深层次因素。

big
SEHK:1460 Earnings and Revenue History August 1st 2024
SEHK:1460 的收益和营业收入历史记录日期是 2024年8月1日。

Zooming In On ICO Group's Earnings

关于 ICO Group 的收益情况深入剖析。

As finance nerds would already know, the accrual ratio from cashflow is a key measure for assessing how well a company's free cash flow (FCF) matches its profit. The accrual ratio subtracts the FCF from the profit for a given period, and divides the result by the average operating assets of the company over that time. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.

正如财务控制狂所知,从现金流中的应计比率是评估公司自由现金流(FCF)与其利润匹配程度的关键指标。应计比率从给定期间的FCF中减去利润,并将结果除以公司在该时间内的平均经营资产。该比率告诉我们公司利润中有多少不受自由现金流支持。

As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.

因此,负应计比率对公司是有益的,而正应计比率则是不利的。这并不是说我们应该担心正应计比率,但值得注意的是应计比率相当高的地方。值得注意的是,有一些学术证据表明,高应计比率通常是短期利润的不良迹象。

Over the twelve months to March 2024, ICO Group recorded an accrual ratio of -0.22. Therefore, its statutory earnings were very significantly less than its free cashflow. Indeed, in the last twelve months it reported free cash flow of HK$94m, well over the HK$16.7m it reported in profit. ICO Group did see its free cash flow drop year on year, which is less than ideal, like a Simpson's episode without Groundskeeper Willie.

在截至 2024 年 3 月的 12 个月中,ICO Group 记录了一个-0.22 的应计比率。因此,其执业业绩远远低于其自由现金流。事实上,在过去的十二个月中,其自由现金流为 HK$ 9400万,远高于其利润报告的 HK $ 1670万。ICO Group 确实看到其自由现金流持续年度下降,这不是理想状态,就像没有 Willie 看守的辛普森剧集。

Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of ICO Group.

注意:我们始终建议投资者检查资产负债表的强度。点击此处以获取 ICO Group 的资产负债表分析。

Our Take On ICO Group's Profit Performance

我们对 ICO Group 的利润表现的看法。

Happily for shareholders, ICO Group produced plenty of free cash flow to back up its statutory profit numbers. Based on this observation, we consider it possible that ICO Group's statutory profit actually understates its earnings potential! And on top of that, its earnings per share have grown at 58% per year over the last three years. At the end of the day, it's essential to consider more than just the factors above, if you want to understand the company properly. So while earnings quality is important, it's equally important to consider the risks facing ICO Group at this point in time. For example, ICO Group has 4 warning signs (and 2 which shouldn't be ignored) we think you should know about.

ICO Group 为股东们提供了足够的自由现金流来支持其执业利润数字。基于这一观察结果,我们认为 ICO Group 的执业利润实际上低估了其盈利潜力!此外,其每股收益在过去三年中增长了58%。归根结底,如果您想正确了解公司,必须考虑多重因素。因此,虽然盈利质量很重要,但同样重要的是要考虑 ICO Group 目前面临的风险。例如,ICO Group 有4个警告标志(以及2个不应忽视的标志),我们认为您应该知道这些标志。

This note has only looked at a single factor that sheds light on the nature of ICO Group's profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.

本注只关注揭示 ICO Group 利润性质的单一因素。但是,还有许多其他方法可以了解公司的情况。一些人认为,高股本回报率是优质企业的好迹象。因此,您可能希望查看这些拥有高股本回报率的公司的免费收藏,或者这些拥有高内部拥有权的股票清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发