share_log

Pamica Technology Corporation's (SZSE:001359) Market Cap Rose CN¥462m Last Week; Private Companies Who Hold 44% Profited and so Did Insiders

Pamica Technology Corporation's (SZSE:001359) Market Cap Rose CN¥462m Last Week; Private Companies Who Hold 44% Profited and so Did Insiders

上周,帕米卡科技股份有限公司(SZSE:001359)的市值增加了人民币46200万;持有44%股份的私人公司以及内部人员都获得了收益。
Simply Wall St ·  08/02 19:57

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significant control over Pamica Technology by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 2 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insider ownership in Pamica Technology is 30%
  • 私人公司对 Pamica Technology 有重大控制权意味着一般公众有更多的权力来影响管理和治理相关决策。
  • 公司前两名股东共持有该公司51%的股份。
  • Pamica Technology 内部持股比例为 30%。

Every investor in Pamica Technology Corporation (SZSE:001359) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 44% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

每个投资 Pamica Technology Corporation(SZSE:001359)的投资者都应该意识到最强大的股东集团。拥有最大股份的是持有 44% 股权的私人公司。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将获得最多利益(或在股市下跌时损失最多)。

Following a 12% increase in the stock price last week, private companies profited the most, but insiders who own 30% stock also stood to gain from the increase.

上周股价上涨了 12%,私人公司获得了最大的利润,但持有 30% 股份的内部股东也从上涨中获得了利益。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Pamica Technology, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入研究 Pamica Technology 的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

big
SZSE:001359 Ownership Breakdown August 2nd 2024
SZSE:001359 所有权结构(2024 年 8 月 2 日):

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pamica Technology?

机构投资者没有持有 Pamica Technology 股票,这说明了什么?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

机构不拥有股票的原因有多种解释。最常见的是公司相对于管理基金过小,因此机构不必仔细审查公司。也有可能是基金经理人不持有股票,因为他们不确信该股票表现良好。机构投资者可能并不认为该业务的历史增长令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。您可以自己看到Zibuyu Group的过去营业收入表现。

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Pamica Technology's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

公司可能没有任何机构投资者出现在股东名册上,原因有很多。如果流动性(每天交易的股份数量)较低,机构投资者可能难以大量购买股份。如果公司没有需要筹集资本的需求,则机构投资者可能缺乏构建头寸的机会。或者,可能由于公司的某些因素,机构投资者远离该公司。Pamica Technology 的盈利和营收记录(如下图)可能对机构投资者不具有吸引力,或者他们可能没有仔细研究这家企业。

big
SZSE:001359 Earnings and Revenue Growth August 2nd 2024
SZSE:001359 盈利和营收增长(2024 年 8 月 2 日):

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Pamica Technology. The company's largest shareholder is Hubei Zhonghui Industrial Co., Ltd., with ownership of 40%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 10% of the stock. Dujiang Pan, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Vice Chairman.

我们注意到,对 Pamica Technology 没有任何有意义的对冲基金投资。该公司最大的股东是湖北中汇实业有限公司,持股比例为 40%。相比之下,第二大和第三大股东持有约 11% 和 10% 的股份。占第三大股东的潘都江还兼任副主席。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

经过进一步挖掘,我们发现前两个股东共同控制了公司50%以上的股份,说明他们有相当大的影响力来影响公司的决策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但考虑到分析师的看法,了解风向也是有意义的。我们的信息表明,该股票没有任何分析师的覆盖,因此它可能鲜为人知。

Insider Ownership Of Pamica Technology

Pamica Technology 内部持股:

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Pamica Technology Corporation. Insiders have a CN¥1.3b stake in this CN¥4.2b business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

看来内部人员拥有 Pamica Technology Corporation 的相当比例的股份。内部人员在这家 42 亿元企业中持有 13 亿元的利益。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有大量股份。您可以单击此处查看他们是否已经买进或卖出股份。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 26% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公众,包括散户投资者,拥有公司的26%股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这样的所有权规模可能不足以在他们的利益中影响一项政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 44%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们可以看到私人公司持有的已发行股份为44%。很难仅从这个事实中得出任何结论,因此了解谁拥有这些私人公司也很值得。有时内部人员或其他关联方通过一个独立的私人公司拥有上市公司的股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Pamica Technology that you should be aware of before investing here.

我认为查看一家公司的所有者是非常有趣的事情。但是为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。例如,我们在此处发现了 Pamica Technology 的 1 个警告标志,您在进行投资之前应该了解这些信息。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

当然,这可能不是最好的购买股票。因此,查看这份免费免费的有趣公司列表可能会有所帮助。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发