share_log

EHang Holdings Limited's (NASDAQ:EH) Stock Price Dropped 7.3% Last Week; Retail Investors Would Not Be Happy

EHang Holdings Limited's (NASDAQ:EH) Stock Price Dropped 7.3% Last Week; Retail Investors Would Not Be Happy

亿航智能控股公司(纳斯达克股票代码:EH)上周股价下跌了7.3%;零售投资者可能不会很开心。
Simply Wall St ·  08/03 08:16

Key Insights

主要见解

  • The considerable ownership by retail investors in EHang Holdings indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 20 shareholders
  • Insider ownership in EHang Holdings is 33%
  • 亿航智能大量股权归零售投资者名下,表明他们在公司管理和业务策略方面具有更大的发言权。
  • 前20名股东持有该公司业务的50%。
  • 亿航智能的内部持股比例为33%。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of EHang Holdings Limited (NASDAQ:EH), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 48% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

为了了解亿航智能有谁真正掌控公司,理解公司的所有权结构是很重要的。在该公司中,零售投资者拥有最多的股份,占公司的48%。也就是说,如果股价上涨,该群体将获得最大的收益(如果出现经济下行,他们也将承担最大的损失)。

While insiders, who own 33% shares weren't spared from last week's US$59m market cap drop, retail investors as a group suffered the maximum losses

尽管持有33%的股份,内部人员并没有幸免于上周亿航智能股市市值下跌5900万美元的影响,但零售投资者却作为一个群体遭受了最大的损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of EHang Holdings.

下图是亿航智能的不同股权所有者的分布情况。

big
NasdaqGM:EH Ownership Breakdown August 3rd 2024
纳斯达克:EH股权分布2024年8月3日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About EHang Holdings?

机构投资者持有亿航智能的股份,这表明该公司在投资者社区具有一定的信誉度。但是,最好不要过于依赖机构投资者所谓的认可。他们也有时会犯错。当多个机构持有股票时,存在他们会参与到相同交易的风险。如果该交易失败,多个方可能会迅速抛售股票。这种风险在一家没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以在下面查看亿航智能的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住故事背后还有更多。

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

We can see that EHang Holdings does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see EHang Holdings' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

纳斯达克:EH收益和营业收入增长2024年8月3日

big
NasdaqGM:EH Earnings and Revenue Growth August 3rd 2024
对于亿航智能的对冲基金而言,其持有的股数并不多。根据我们的数据,最大的股东是创始人Huazhi Hu,持有公司31%的股份。Axim Wealth Management LLC和Carmignac Gestion SA分别持有公司7.4%和2.9%的股份,是第二和第三大股东。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in EHang Holdings. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Huazhi Hu with 31% of shares outstanding. With 7.4% and 2.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, Axim Wealth Management LLC and Carmignac Gestion SA are the second and third largest shareholders.

亿航智能的内部持股情况 我们最近的数据显示,内部人员持有亿航智能有限公司相当比例的股份。内部人员在这家市值为7730万美元的公司持有价值为2530万美元的股票。这可能意味着创始人仍然拥有大量股份。您可以点击此处查看他们是否一直在买卖。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 20 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过更多深入调查,我们发现前20大股东在该公司中拥有的股权总共占50%,表明没有单一股东对该公司具有重大的控制权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of EHang Holdings

零售投资者持有48%的股份,这表明在亿航智能的决策不与其他大股东保持一致时,个体投资者有一定的影响力。尽管持股比例相当大,但如果没有其他大股东的支持,他们的影响力可能还不足以改变公司的政策。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of EHang Holdings Limited. Insiders own US$253m worth of shares in the US$773m company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

对于一家公司,了解股权所有者的不同群体总是值得思考。但是,为了更好地了解亿航智能,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,风险——亿航智能存在1个警告信号,我们认为您应该知道。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 48% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over EHang Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand EHang Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - EHang Holdings has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发