Institutional Owners May Ignore Rocky Brands, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RCKY) Recent US$58m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Institutional Owners May Ignore Rocky Brands, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RCKY) Recent US$58m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Rocky Brands' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Insiders have sold recently
- 考虑到机构持有股份的较高比例,Rocky Brands的股价可能会受到他们的交易决策的影响。
- 共有10位投资者持有该公司的大部分股份,占有52%的所有权。
- 近期内有内部人士出售股票
If you want to know who really controls Rocky Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ:RCKY), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 76% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果您想了解Rocky Brands, Inc.(NASDAQ:RCKY)真正的控制者,那么您需要查看其股权登记册的构成。持有该公司76%所有权的是机构,这意味着这个群体面临着最大的上行(或下行)潜力。
No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 21% in value last week. However, the 47% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
没有股东喜欢在投资中亏钱,尤其是机构投资者在上周看到他们的持股价值下跌21%之后。但是,股东取得的47%的一年回报率可能缓解了这种打击。不过,我们认为,他们将会寻找未来的市场弱点。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Rocky Brands, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解Rocky Brands的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240804/0-3a9a6771b0b3b9e42759e56a7407a687-0-63225d49b1230ae875c002f809b59254.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Rocky Brands?
机构股权告诉我们Rocky Brands的什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
We can see that Rocky Brands does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Rocky Brands, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到Rocky Brands确实拥有机构投资者,他们持有公司股份的相当一部分。这表明专业投资者对该公司有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构也会犯错误的投资,就像每个人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图出售一只股票,股价下跌很多并不罕见。因此,值得检查Rocky Brands过去的盈利轨迹(如下所示)。当然,还需考虑其他因素。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240804/0-3a9a6771b0b3b9e42759e56a7407a687-1-f24278d29658f8fdff71468194e64582.png/big)
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Rocky Brands. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is FMR LLC with 15% of shares outstanding. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP is the second largest shareholder owning 7.6% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 6.4% of the company stock.
机构投资者占有公司股份的50%以上,因此他们可以共同影响董事会决策。我们注意到,对于该公司流通股的15%,最大的股东是FMR LLC。Dimensional Fund Advisors LP是第二大股东,持有普通股的7.6%,而BlackRock, Inc.持有该公司股份的6.4%。
We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我们做了更多的研究,发现前十大股东拥有约52%的股份,这意味着除了大股东,还有一些小股东,从而在一定程度上平衡各自的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的推荐也是一个好礼。该股票受到的分析师覆盖范围很小,但不多。因此,它有更多的空间获得更多的覆盖范围。
Insider Ownership Of Rocky Brands
Rocky Brands的内部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Rocky Brands, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$218m, and insiders have US$7.7m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们最近的数据表明,内部人员持有Rocky Brands, Inc.的一些股份。它的市值仅为2180万美元,内部人员持有770万美元的股票。有人会说这显示了股东和董事会之间的利益一致。但是,最好检查这些内部人员是否一直在抛售股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in Rocky Brands. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公众持有Rocky Brands20%的股份,尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以在他们有利地面推动一项决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Rocky Brands (of which 2 are potentially serious!) you should know about.
虽然考虑到拥有公司的不同群体的情况是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,风险。每个公司都有风险,而我们已经发现了Rocky Brands的3条警告信号(其中2条潜在严重!)您应该知道。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。