Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Chinasoft International Limited's (HKG:354) Latest 6.6% Drop Adds to a Year Losses
Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Chinasoft International Limited's (HKG:354) Latest 6.6% Drop Adds to a Year Losses
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Chinasoft International implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 6 shareholders own 52% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 机构持有中软国际的大量股份表明他们对公司股价有重要影响力。
- 前6大股东拥有公司的52%股份。
- 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。
A look at the shareholders of Chinasoft International Limited (HKG:354) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 51% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
从中软国际有哪些股东可以看出哪个群体最有力量。机构持有51%的股份,是公司最大的股东。也就是说,如果股价上涨,他们将获利最多(或如果出现下跌,则将蒙受最大损失)。
And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to HK$8.8b last week after a 6.6% drop in the share price. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 22% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Chinasoft International, which might have negative implications on individual investors.
因此,在公司市值下跌6.6%导致上周下跌到88亿港元之后,机构投资者是受到最大冲击的群体。最近的亏损加剧了股东一年的亏损22%,这可能对这一投资者群体不利。机构被称为“聪明钱”,他们对股票价格波动有很大的影响力。因此,如果下跌趋势继续,机构可能面临出售中软国际的压力,这可能对个人投资者产生负面影响。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Chinasoft International.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于中软国际的什么。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chinasoft International?
机构持股对中软国际意味着什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
We can see that Chinasoft International does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Chinasoft International's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到中软国际拥有机构投资者,他们持有公司股票的很大一部分,这表明在专业投资者中拥有一定的认可度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会进行糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。如果多个机构同时改变对股票的看法,股票价格可能会迅速下跌。因此,以下是值得关注的中软国际收益历史数据。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Chinasoft International is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Dan Capital Management Ltd. with 14% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 9.2% of the stock. Yuhong Chen, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.
投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有公司超过一半的股份,因此他们可以共同发挥重大影响力。中软国际不是由对冲基金持有的。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是担保基金管理有限公司,持有14%的流通股份。相比之下,第二大和第三大股东持有该股票的股份约为10%和9.2%。第三大股东陈煜宏也恰好担任董事长。
We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我们进行了更深入的挖掘,发现前六位股东占注册表的约52%,这意味着除较大的股东外,还有一些较小的股东,因此在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Chinasoft International
中软国际的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Chinasoft International Limited. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around HK$871m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们最新的数据表明,内部人员拥有中软国际有限公司的一些股份。这是一家规模相当大的公司,因此看到一些潜在的有意义的一致性是正面的。在这种情况下,他们拥有约87100万港元的股份(按当前价格计算)。如果你想探讨内部人员的一致性问题,可以点击这里查看内部人员是否一直在买卖。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 26% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通大众——包括零售投资者——拥有该公司的26%股份,因此不容易被忽视。虽然拥有规模相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东的决策不一致,可能无法改变公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
With a stake of 14%, private equity firms could influence the Chinasoft International board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
凭借14%的持股,私募股权公司可能会影响中软国际的董事会。有时我们会看到私募股权公司长期持有,但总体而言,他们的投资视野较短,因此不太会在公共公司上投资。过段时间后,他们可能会考虑出售并重新部署资本到其他地方。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我觉得查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我总是喜欢查看营业收入增长的历史记录,你也可以免费访问这个详细图表中的历史营收和收益图表。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。