In the Wake of New York Mortgage Trust, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:NYMT) Latest US$62m Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions
In the Wake of New York Mortgage Trust, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:NYMT) Latest US$62m Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in New York Mortgage Trust implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- The top 25 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 机构在纽约抵押信托中持有的大量股份意味着他们对公司股价有重大影响。
- 前25位股东拥有公司的50%股份。
- 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。
If you want to know who really controls New York Mortgage Trust, Inc. (NASDAQ:NYMT), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 55% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果您想知道谁真正控制纽约抵押信托公司(NASDAQ:NYMT),那么您就需要看一下它的股权登记簿的结构。 持有公司股份数量最多的一组,精确地说,占公司股份的55%左右,是机构。 换句话说,这组可能面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$559m last week after a 11% drop in the share price. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 28% for shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell New York Mortgage Trust, which might have negative implications on individual investors.
因此,在上周公司市值下跌11%之后,机构投资者成为了受影响最大的一组,市值跌至5590万美元。这组投资者可能会特别关注当前的亏损,这增加了股东一年内的亏损28%。机构投资者也被称为“聪明钱”,它们对股票价格的走势产生了很大的影响,因此,如果下降趋势继续,机构可能面临出售纽约抵押信托的压力,这可能会对个人投资者产生负面影响。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about New York Mortgage Trust.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东对纽约抵押信托的了解,可以告诉我们什么。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About New York Mortgage Trust?
机构持有股份告诉我们关于纽约抵押信托的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in New York Mortgage Trust. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at New York Mortgage Trust's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在纽约抵押信托中拥有相当数量的股份,这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师们已经看过这支股票并且他们喜欢它。但是,就像其他任何人一样,他们可能是错的。如果多个机构同时改变他们对股票的看法,您可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得看看纽约抵押信托下面的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. New York Mortgage Trust is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 17% of shares outstanding. With 6.7% and 4.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Allspring Global Investments, LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的流通股,董事会可能会注意到他们的偏好。纽约抵押信托未被对冲基金所拥有。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是黑石集团公司,持有公司流通股的17%。其次是持有流通股6.7%和4.0%的The Vanguard Group, Inc.和Allspring Global Investments, LLC。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 25 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
对我们的所有权数据进行更深入的分析表明,前25名股东拥有合计50%的股份,这意味着没有任何单一股东拥有多数股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of New York Mortgage Trust
纽约抵押信托的内部股权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
We can see that insiders own shares in New York Mortgage Trust, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$8.8m worth of the US$559m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们可以看到内部人持有纽约抵押信托股票。作为个人,内部人合计持有该公司价值880万美元的股份。这至少表明了一些对齐。您可以单击此处查看这些内部人是否一直在买卖。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 43% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over New York Mortgage Trust. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
持有公司43%的公众股东,大多由个人投资者组成,对纽约抵押信托拥有一定的影响力。虽然这个群体不能确定地叫嚣,但它确实能够在公司经营方面产生真正的影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand New York Mortgage Trust better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for New York Mortgage Trust that you should be aware of before investing here.
始终值得考虑不同持股集团的利益。但是,要更好地了解纽约抵押信托,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们发现了1个警告信号,提醒您在此投资之前需加以注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。