share_log

Disappointing Week for WK Kellogg Co (NYSE:KLG) Institutional Investors Who Control 81% of the Company

Disappointing Week for WK Kellogg Co (NYSE:KLG) Institutional Investors Who Control 81% of the Company

纽交所肯瑞糖有限公司(Wk Kellogg Co)的机构投资者度过了令人失望的一周,他们控制着该公司的81%。
Simply Wall St ·  08/07 09:02

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in WK Kellogg Co implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 11 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 机构在Wk Kellogg Co中拥有大量股份,这意味着它们对该公司的股价具有重大影响力。
  • 前11大股东拥有该公司50%的股份。
  • 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,您可以更好地评估公司未来的业绩。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of WK Kellogg Co (NYSE:KLG), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 81% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解Wk Kellogg Co(NYSE:KLG)真正掌控公司的人,了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。最持有该公司股份的组别是机构,占81%的所有权。换句话说,该组别有可能从其对该公司的投资中获得最多(或最少)。

And last week, institutional endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 8.1%.

上周,机构遭受的最大损失是股票下跌了8.1%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of WK Kellogg Co, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入研究Wk Kellogg Co的每一种业主类型,从下面的图表开始。

big
NYSE:KLG Ownership Breakdown August 7th 2024
NYSE:KLG所有权分布图2024年8月7日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About WK Kellogg Co?

机构所有权对Wk Kellogg Co有什么影响?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

WK Kellogg Co already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at WK Kellogg Co's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

Wk Kellogg Co已经有机构投资者占股。实际上,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这表明该公司在投资社区中有一定的可信度。然而,最好不要过于依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓确认。他们有时也会犯错。如果多个机构同时改变对某只股票的看法,您可能会看到股价的迅速下跌。因此,值得查看Wk Kellogg Co下面的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:KLG Earnings and Revenue Growth August 7th 2024
NYSE:KLG盈利和营业收入增长2024年8月7日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in WK Kellogg Co. Our data shows that W.K. Kellogg Foundation, Endowment Fund is the largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. With 9.7% and 6.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的发行股份,董事会可能会关注他们的偏好。对于Wk Kellogg Co,对冲基金拥有的股份不多。我们的数据显示,W.k. Kellogg基金会,捐赠基金是最大的股东,持有16%的优先股。The Vanguard Group, Inc.以9.7%和6.2%的优先股分别是第二大和第三大股东。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股东登记册,我们发现其中 50% 的所有权受前11位股东控制,这意味着没有单一股东掌握所有权益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of WK Kellogg Co

Wk Kellogg Co内部股权拥有情况

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in WK Kellogg Co. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$18m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们最近的数据表明,内部人员拥有Wk Kellogg Co的某些股份。这是一家相当大的公司,因此看到一些潜在的重要股东持股水平相当高是一个积极的信号。在这种情况下,他们持有约1800万美元的股票(以当前价格计算)。看到内部人员这样的投资水平是很好的。您可以在此处检查他们最近是否一直在购买股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over WK Kellogg Co. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

拥有18%所有权的普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对Wk Kellogg Co具有一定的影响力。虽然拥有这样的所有权很大,但如果这个决定与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand WK Kellogg Co better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with WK Kellogg Co , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

考虑到持股人的不同群体总是值得思考的。但要更好地了解Wk Kellogg Co,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,不断存在的投资风险。我们已经确定了Wk Kellogg Co的3个警告信号,并且了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发