Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Radius Recycling, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RDUS) Latest 20% Drop Adds to a Year Losses
Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Radius Recycling, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RDUS) Latest 20% Drop Adds to a Year Losses
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Radius Recycling's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 因机构对该股票持有大量股份,Radius Recycling的股价可能会受到它们交易决策的影响。
- 10个投资者拥有该公司51%的股权。
- 通过公司过去的业绩数据和股权研究,人们可以更好地评估一家公司的未来表现。
If you want to know who really controls Radius Recycling, Inc. (NASDAQ:RDUS), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 82% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果想知道谁真正控制着Radius Recycling,Inc. (纳斯达克:RDUS),那么你需要看一下其股权登记簿的构成。持有该公司82%股权的机构拥有最大份额。换言之,该机构将从其对公司的投资中获得(或蒙受)最多的利益。
And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 20% last week. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 53% for shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. Hence, if weakness in Radius Recycling's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.
机构投资者上周看到他们的持股价值下跌了20%。这批投资者可能会特别关注当前的亏损,因为这为股东带来了一年内的53%的损失。机构有很大的影响力来推动股票价格的变化。如果Radius Recycling的股价继续弱势,机构投资者可能会感到强烈的卖出股票的冲动,这对个人投资者可能不是理想的选择。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Radius Recycling, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入地了解Radius Recycling的每种股东类型,从下面的图表开始。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240807/0-b88c14db3c9ac0b8b5e3d6a3f986bee7-0-627c6ab55de4ff261e5a0a81828884e9.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Radius Recycling?
机构投资者的持股情况对Radius Recycling有何启示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
Radius Recycling already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Radius Recycling's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Radius Recycling已经有机构投资者持有一定股份,这表明其在专业投资者中具有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时也会犯错误,就像每个人一样。如果多家机构同时改变他们对股票的看法,你会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得看看Radius Recycling下面的收益历史。当然,未来才是最重要的。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240807/0-b88c14db3c9ac0b8b5e3d6a3f986bee7-1-09c25f94003ad15ce24b553b977aadde.png/big)
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Radius Recycling. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.4% and 7.8% of the stock. In addition, we found that Tamara Lundgren, the CEO has 3.7% of the shares allocated to their name.
投资者应注意,实际上机构持有超过公司的一半,因此他们可以共同发挥重大作用。我们注意到对Radius Recycling没有任何实际投资的对冲基金。目前,黑石集团是最大的股东,持有12%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有该股票的约9.4%和7.8%的股份。此外,我们发现首席执行官塔玛拉·伦德格伦拥有3.7%的股份。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 10 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
进一步调查发现,该公司的股份超过一半由前十大股东持有,表明较大股东的利益在某种程度上被较小股东平衡。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
上海阿拉丁生物化学技术股份有限公司的内部人员拥有重要比例,内部人员在这家总价值27亿人民币的公司中持有12亿人民币的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有很多股份。您可以单击此处查看他们是否进行了买卖。
Insider Ownership Of Radius Recycling
Radius Recycling内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Radius Recycling, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$22m worth of the US$407m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
股东们可能会感兴趣地了解,Radius Recycling,Inc.的内部人员拥有公司的股份。总体而言,内部人员共持有这家价值为US$4140万的公司价值US$2200万的股份。这显示了至少有一些协调。你可以点击这里查看内部人员是否购买或销售。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Radius Recycling. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
掌握着Radius Recycling 13%的股份,主要由个人投资者组成的公众,对Radius Recycling仍然有一定的影响力。尽管这种所有权的大小可能还不足以影响他们的有利政策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Radius Recycling (1 is a bit unpleasant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
我非常有兴趣看看到底谁拥有一家公司。但要真正获取洞察力,我们还需考虑其他信息。例如,我们发现了Radius Recycling的2个警示征兆(其中1个有点不好!),在投资此处之前,你应该对此有所了解。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。