share_log

SelectQuote, Inc.'s (NYSE:SLQT) Market Cap Dropped US$125m Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 45% Were Hit as Were Institutions

SelectQuote, Inc.'s (NYSE:SLQT) Market Cap Dropped US$125m Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 45% Were Hit as Were Institutions

SelectQuote, Inc.(纽交所:SLQT)的市值上周下降了1.25亿美元;持股45%的个人投资者和机构都受到了影响。
Simply Wall St ·  08/07 09:53

Key Insights

主要见解

  • SelectQuote's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 47% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Institutions own 37% of SelectQuote
  • SelectQuote的重要零售投资者所有权表明关键决策受到来自更大的公众股东的影响。
  • 前25大股东持有47%的业务。
  • 机构拥有SelectQuote的37%。

If you want to know who really controls SelectQuote, Inc. (NYSE:SLQT), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 45% to be precise, is retail investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道谁真正控制SelectQuote,Inc.(纽交所:SLQT),那么您必须看看其股权登记簿的组成。拥有公司最多股份的组别,确切地说约为45%,是散户投资者。换句话说,该组面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Following a 18% decrease in the stock price last week, retail investors suffered the most losses, but institutions who own 37% stock also took a hit.

上周股价下跌18%后,散户投资者遭受了最大的损失,但拥有37%股份的机构也受到了打击。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about SelectQuote.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于SelectQuote的什么情况。

big
NYSE:SLQT Ownership Breakdown August 7th 2024
纽交所:SLQt所有权结构分解2024年8月7日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SelectQuote?

机构所有权告诉我们关于SelectQuote的什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

SelectQuote already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at SelectQuote's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

SelectQuote已经有机构在股权登记簿上。确实,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这可能表明公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。但是,最好谨慎依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也会犯错误。如果多个机构同时改变其对股票的看法,您可能会看到股价迅速下降。因此,值得查看下面的SelectQuote收入历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:SLQT Earnings and Revenue Growth August 7th 2024
纽交所:SLQt收益和营收增长2024年8月7日

SelectQuote is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Brookside Equity Partners LLC, with ownership of 9.3%. With 6.0% and 4.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Abrams Bison Investments, L.L.C. are the second and third largest shareholders. Furthermore, CEO Timothy Danker is the owner of 1.1% of the company's shares.

SelectQuote不是由对冲基金拥有的。该公司最大的股东是Brookside Equity Partners LLC,拥有9.3%的股份。BlackRock,Inc.和Abrams Bison Investments,L.L.C.分别拥有6.0%和4.7%的流通股。此外,首席执行官Timothy Danker拥有公司股份的1.1%。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

对我们的所有权数据进行更深入的研究表明,前25名股东的持股总额不到注册表的一半,表明有一个小股东的大群体,其中没有单个股东拥有多数股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。虽然该公司有一些分析师关注,但它可能没有得到广泛关注。因此,它可能在未来得到更多关注。

Insider Ownership Of SelectQuote

SelectQuote的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in SelectQuote, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$560m, and insiders have US$50m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们最近的数据表明,内部人员拥有SelectQuote,Inc.的某些股份。它的市值仅为5600万美元,内部人员拥有5000万美元的股份。这至少显示出一定的一致性。您可以点击此处查看内部人员是否一直在购买或出售股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 45% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over SelectQuote. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

拥有45%股份的普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对SelectQuote具有某种程度的影响。虽然该组不能必然决策,但它确实可以对公司的运行产生实质性的影响。

Private Equity Ownership

股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

Private equity firms hold a 9.3% stake in SelectQuote. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

私募股权公司持有SelectQuote的9.3%股份。这表明他们可能会在关键政策决策中产生影响。某些投资者可能会因此受到鼓舞,因为私募股权有时能够鼓励制定有助于市场看到公司价值的战略。或者,这些持有人可能在把它上市后退出投资。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for SelectQuote (of which 1 is concerning!) you should know about.

虽然考虑到拥有公司的不同团体很值得,但其他因素更为重要。例如风险。每家公司都会有风险,我们已经发现SelectQuote有2个警告信号(其中1个令人担忧!)值得您了解。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发