share_log

These 4 Measures Indicate That PepsiCo (NASDAQ:PEP) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

These 4 Measures Indicate That PepsiCo (NASDAQ:PEP) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

这4项措施表明百事可乐(纳斯达克:PEP)合理运用债务。
Simply Wall St ·  08/08 07:20

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that PepsiCo, Inc. (NASDAQ:PEP) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

传奇基金经理陆正茂(查理·芒格支持的人)曾经说过:“最大的投资风险不是价格的波动,而是是否会遭受资本的永久性损失。”因此,当您考虑任何给定的股票有多大风险时,需要考虑债务,因为太多债务可能会使一家公司陷入困境。我们可以看到,百事可乐公司(纳斯达克:PEP)在其业务中确实使用了债务。但是,这种债务是否会担忧股东呢?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

为什么债务会带来风险?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

债务是帮助企业增长的工具,但如果企业无法偿还其贷款人,那么它就处在贷款人的控制之下。 如果情况变得非常糟糕,贷款人可以控制企业。 然而,更常见的(但仍然痛苦的)情况是必须以低价筹集新股本,从而永久地稀释股东权益。当然,债务可以是企业中的重要工具,特别是在资本密集型企业中。当我们检查债务水平时,我们首先考虑现金和债务水平。

How Much Debt Does PepsiCo Carry?

百事可乐承载了多少债务?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that PepsiCo had US$44.9b in debt in June 2024; about the same as the year before. On the flip side, it has US$6.67b in cash leading to net debt of about US$38.3b.

下图显示,您可以单击查看详细信息,百事可乐于2024年6月份的债务为449亿美元,与前一年大致相同。而现金为66.7亿美元,导致净债务约为383亿美元。

big
NasdaqGS:PEP Debt to Equity History August 8th 2024
NasdaqGS:PEP资产负债率历史记录2024年8月8日

How Strong Is PepsiCo's Balance Sheet?

百事可乐的资产负债表有多强?

The latest balance sheet data shows that PepsiCo had liabilities of US$31.1b due within a year, and liabilities of US$48.8b falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$6.67b and US$11.9b worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$61.3b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

最新的资产负债表数据显示,百事可乐有311亿美元的短期负债,之后有488亿美元的到期债务。另一方面,其现金为66.7亿美元,短期应收账款为119亿美元。因此,它的负债总额比其现金和短期应收账款加起来还多613亿美元。

While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since PepsiCo has a huge market capitalization of US$236.9b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.

虽然这可能看起来很多,但这并不是太坏,因为百事可乐市值非常高,达到了2369亿美元,因此,如果需要,它可能可以通过发行股票来加强资产负债表。然而,仍有必要仔细研究其偿还债务的能力。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

为了对公司的债务相对于其收益进行规模适应,我们计算其净债务与利息、税、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA)之比及其税前收益(EBIT)与利息支出之比(利息保障倍数)。因此,我们既考虑到不包括折旧和摊销费用在内的收益,又包括折旧和摊销费用的收益相对于债务。

PepsiCo's net debt to EBITDA ratio of about 2.3 suggests only moderate use of debt. And its commanding EBIT of 14.6 times its interest expense, implies the debt load is as light as a peacock feather. PepsiCo grew its EBIT by 9.1% in the last year. That's far from incredible but it is a good thing, when it comes to paying off debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine PepsiCo's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

百事可乐的净债务/ EBITDA比率约为2.3,表明债务使用仅适度。其主导的EBIt为14.6倍于其利息支出,这意味着债务负载像孔雀羽毛一样轻盈。百事可乐在过去一年中的EBIt增长了9.1%。虽然不是令人难以置信,但在偿还债务方面还是件好事。资产负债表显然是分析债务的关注点。但是,与其它事情相比,未来的盈利更能决定百事可乐维持健康的资产负债表的能力。因此,如果您想了解专业人士的看法,您可能会发现这篇有关分析师利润预测的免费报告很有趣。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, PepsiCo recorded free cash flow of 49% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.

最后,企业需要自由现金流来偿还债务;会计利润无法解决问题。因此,值得检查的是EBIt的多少被自由现金流支持。查看最近三年的数据,百事可乐的自由现金流为其EBIt的49%,这比我们预期的要弱。这在偿还债务方面并不好。

Our View

我们的观点

When it comes to the balance sheet, the standout positive for PepsiCo was the fact that it seems able to cover its interest expense with its EBIT confidently. However, our other observations weren't so heartening. For instance it seems like it has to struggle a bit handle its debt, based on its EBITDA,. When we consider all the elements mentioned above, it seems to us that PepsiCo is managing its debt quite well. Having said that, the load is sufficiently heavy that we would recommend any shareholders keep a close eye on it. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for PepsiCo that you should be aware of before investing here.

当涉及资产负债表时,百事可乐最突出的优点是,它似乎能够自信地用其EBIt支付利息费用。但是,我们的其他观察并不那么令人振奋。例如,根据其EBITDA,它似乎有点难以应对其债务。当我们考虑上述所有要素时,似乎百事可乐对其债务的管理相当不错。话虽如此,由于负担足够沉重,我们建议所有股东都要密切关注它。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显而易见的起点。然而,并非所有的投资风险都存在于资产负债表中,相反,还有其他方面。例如,我们发现了PepsiCo三个警告信号,您在进行投资之前应该注意。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

说到底,有时候更容易集中精力关注根本不需要债务的公司。读者可以免费访问零净债务增长股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发