Can Lucas GC Limited's (NASDAQ:LGCL) ROE Continue To Surpass The Industry Average?
Can Lucas GC Limited's (NASDAQ:LGCL) ROE Continue To Surpass The Industry Average?
One of the best investments we can make is in our own knowledge and skill set. With that in mind, this article will work through how we can use Return On Equity (ROE) to better understand a business. We'll use ROE to examine Lucas GC Limited (NASDAQ:LGCL), by way of a worked example.
我们可以从自身的知识和技能方面进行最佳的投资。有了这个想法,本文将通过一个示例Lucas GC有限公司(NASDAQ:LGCL)来讲解我们如何使用回报率(ROE)更好地理解业务。
Return on equity or ROE is an important factor to be considered by a shareholder because it tells them how effectively their capital is being reinvested. In other words, it is a profitability ratio which measures the rate of return on the capital provided by the company's shareholders.
对于股东来说,股东回报率(ROE)是一个重要的考虑因素,因为它告诉股东他们的资本被有效地再投资了多少。换句话说,它是一个衡量公司股东提供的资本回报率的盈利能力比率。
How To Calculate Return On Equity?
如何计算股东权益报酬率?
The formula for ROE is:
roe的公式是:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
净资产收益率 = 净利润(从持续经营中获得)÷ 股东权益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Lucas GC is:
所以,根据上述公式,Lucas GC的ROE为:
40% = CN¥78m ÷ CN¥197m (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2023).
40% = CN¥7800万 ÷ CN¥19700万(基于2023年12月的过去12个月)
The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.40 in profit.
“回报率”是指过去12个月税后收益的金额。一个概念化的方式是,对于每1美元的股东资本,公司赚了40美分的利润。
Does Lucas GC Have A Good Return On Equity?
Lucas GC的ROE是否有良好的回报?
By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. As you can see in the graphic below, Lucas GC has a higher ROE than the average (14%) in the Professional Services industry.
通过将公司ROE与行业平均水平进行比较,我们可以快速衡量其综合表现。但需要注意的是,这远非一种完美的衡量标准,因为即使是在同一行业分类中,公司之间也存在明显差异。如下图所示,Lucas GC在专业服务行业的平均水平(14%)之上,具有更高的ROE。
That is a good sign. However, bear in mind that a high ROE doesn't necessarily indicate efficient profit generation. Aside from changes in net income, a high ROE can also be the outcome of high debt relative to equity, which indicates risk. To know the 2 risks we have identified for Lucas GC visit our risks dashboard for free.
这是一个好迹象。但需要记住,高ROE并不一定意味着有效的利润率。除净利润的变化之外,高ROE还可能是相对于股本而言高风险的高额债务的结果。访问我们的风险仪表板查看我们已识别的Lucas GC的两个风险,还是免费的。
The Importance Of Debt To Return On Equity
债务对股本回报率的重要性
Companies usually need to invest money to grow their profits. That cash can come from retained earnings, issuing new shares (equity), or debt. In the first and second cases, the ROE will reflect this use of cash for investment in the business. In the latter case, the debt required for growth will boost returns, but will not impact the shareholders' equity. In this manner the use of debt will boost ROE, even though the core economics of the business stay the same.
一般来说,公司需要投资以增加其利润。这些资金可以来自留存收益、发行新股(股权)或债务。在前两种情况下,ROE将反映这些投资在业务中的使用情况。在后一种情况下,用于增长所需的债务将提高回报率,但不会影响股东权益。通过这种方式使用债务将提高ROE,即使业务的核心经济学仍然相同。
Combining Lucas GC's Debt And Its 40% Return On Equity
结合Lucas GC的负债和其40%的ROE
Although Lucas GC does use debt, its debt to equity ratio of 0.20 is still low. When I see a high ROE, fuelled by only modest debt, I suspect the business is high quality. Careful use of debt to boost returns is often very good for shareholders. However, it could reduce the company's ability to take advantage of future opportunities.
虽然Lucas GC确实使用了债务,但其债务股本比0.20仍较低。当我看到高ROE仅由适度债务支持时,我会怀疑该业务的质量。谨慎使用债务以提高回报往往对股东非常有利。但是,这可能会降低公司利用未来机会的能力。
Conclusion
结论
Return on equity is one way we can compare its business quality of different companies. In our books, the highest quality companies have high return on equity, despite low debt. All else being equal, a higher ROE is better.
回报率是我们比较不同公司业务质量的一种方式。在我们的书籍中,高质量的公司具有高的资本回报率,尽管低债务。其他因素相等的情况下,高ROE越好。
But ROE is just one piece of a bigger puzzle, since high quality businesses often trade on high multiples of earnings. It is important to consider other factors, such as future profit growth -- and how much investment is required going forward. So I think it may be worth checking this free this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
但ROE只是整个难题的一部分,因为高质量的业务通常会以高倍数的收益进行交易。重要的是考虑其他因素,比如未来的利润增长——还有需要未来多少投资。因此,我认为检查过去收益、营收和现金流的详细图表可能是值得的。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.
如果您想查看另一家可能具有更好财务状况的公司 - 具有高股本回报率和低债务的公司,那么请不要错过这份有趣公司列表,该列表免费提供。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。