share_log

In the Wake of Stem, Inc.'s (NYSE:STEM) Latest US$101m Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions

In the Wake of Stem, Inc.'s (NYSE:STEM) Latest US$101m Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions

在Stem, Inc.(纽交所:STEM)市值大跌1010万美元之后,机构所有者可能被迫采取严厉的行动
Simply Wall St ·  08/08 11:17

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Stem implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 49% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 机构在Stem中的大量持股意味着它们对该公司股价有很大的影响。
  • 前25名股东持有49%的业务。
  • 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,您可以更好地评估公司未来的业绩。

A look at the shareholders of Stem, Inc. (NYSE:STEM) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 64% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看Stem, Inc.(纽交所:STEM)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最有权力。 持有该公司股份的群体,确切地说是约64%的机构。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$162m last week after a 52% drop in the share price. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 91% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Stem which might hurt individual investors.

因此,当上周该公司的市值降至1.62亿美元,股价下跌52%后,机构投资者成为受影响最大的群体。最近的亏损增加了股东1年91%的亏损,这可能对这组投资者不利。通常被称为“市场动力者”的机构在影响任何股票的价格动态方面具有重要的影响力。因此,如果下降持续下去,机构投资者可能会面临卖出Stem的压力,这可能会伤害个人投资者。在下面的图表中,我们放大了Stem的不同所有权群体。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Stem.

在下面的图表中,我们放大了Stem的不同所有权群体。

big
NYSE:STEM Ownership Breakdown August 8th 2024
纽交所:STEm所有权构成2024年8月8日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Stem?

机构所有权对Stem的意义是什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Stem. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Stem, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,机构投资者在Stem中拥有相当多的权益。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经查看了该股票并且他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能是错的。 如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,值得检查Stem的过去收益轨迹(如下所示)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NYSE:STEM Earnings and Revenue Growth August 8th 2024
纽交所:STEm利润和营业收入增长2024年8月8日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Stem. Schroder Investment Management Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 7.2% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.1% by the third-largest shareholder.

机构投资者拥有超过50%的公司股份,因此他们可能会强烈影响董事会的决策。对Stem的对冲基金并不拥有太多股份。Schroder Investment Management Limited目前是最大的股东,持有7.2%的流通股。为了获得背景信息,第二大股东持有约7.0%的流通股,第三大股东持有5.1%的股份。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

对我们的所有权数据进行更深入的研究表明,前25名股东的持股总额不到注册表的一半,表明有一个小股东的大群体,其中没有单个股东拥有多数股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of Stem

Stem的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Stem, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$6.8m worth of the US$162m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but we usually like to see higher insider holdings. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们可以报告说,内部人员拥有Stem,Inc.的股票。作为个人,内部人员集体拥有价值680万美元的价值16200万美元公司的股票。看到内部人员有投资是好事,但我们通常更喜欢看到更高的内部持股。检查这些内部人员是否一直在购买股票可能是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 31% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公众 - 包括散户投资者 - 持有公司31%的股份,因此不能轻易被忽视。虽然此种持股规模可能不足以在他们的利益中左右决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Stem you should be aware of, and 2 of them are a bit unpleasant.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司股票的不同群体非常值得,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如:我们发现有4个Stem的警告信号您应该了解,其中有2个不太愉快。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发