share_log

Yanlord Land Group Limited's (SGX:Z25) Largest Shareholder, CEO Sheng Jian Zhong Sees Holdings Value Fall by 7.6% Following Recent Drop

Yanlord Land Group Limited's (SGX:Z25) Largest Shareholder, CEO Sheng Jian Zhong Sees Holdings Value Fall by 7.6% Following Recent Drop

仁恒置地集团有限公司(新加坡交易所:Z25)的最大股东、CEO盛建中先生最近持股价值下跌了7.6%
Simply Wall St ·  08/09 06:02

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significant insider control over Yanlord Land Group implies vested interests in company growth
  • Sheng Jian Zhong owns 72% of the company
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 仁恒置地集团内部人员对公司增长的控制意味着利益相关。
  • 盛坚忠拥有该公司的72%股权。
  • 所有权研究结合过去的表现数据可以帮助更好地理解股票的机会。

If you want to know who really controls Yanlord Land Group Limited (SGX:Z25), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 74% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想知道谁真正控制了仁恒置地集团有限公司(新加坡交易所:Z25),那么您需要查看其股票登记册的构成。持股比例最大的是个人内部人员,持有74%的股权。也就是说,如果股票上涨,则该群体将获得最大的利益(或如果出现衰退将蒙受最大的损失)。

As market cap fell to S$821m last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

由于市值上周降至8,210万新元,内部人员将面临公司股东中最高的损失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Yanlord Land Group, beginning with the chart below.

接下来,让我们深入了解仁恒置地集团的每种股东类型,从下面的图表开始。

big
SGX:Z25 Ownership Breakdown August 8th 2024
新加坡交易所:Z25所有权图表(2024年8月8日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Yanlord Land Group?

机构对仁恒置地集团告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

Institutions have a very small stake in Yanlord Land Group. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.

机构在仁恒置地集团中的持股很少。这表明该公司受到一些基金的关注,但目前并不受专业投资者特别青睐。如果该公司从这里开始变得更强大,我们可能会看到更多的机构希望购买。有时,当一些大型机构同时想要购买某只股票时,我们会看到股票价格上涨。您可以在下面看到的营收和收入历史记录可能有所帮助,考虑是否更多机构投资者会想要该股票。当然,还有其他许多因素需要考虑。

big
SGX:Z25 Earnings and Revenue Growth August 8th 2024
新加坡交易所:Z25盈利和营收增长情况(2024年8月8日)

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Yanlord Land Group. With a 72% stake, CEO Sheng Jian Zhong is the largest shareholder. With such a huge stake, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. It's usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider with such skin in the game. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 1.6% and 1.5% of the stock.

对于仁恒置地集团,对冲基金股份不多。拥有72%股份的首席执行官盛坚忠是最大的股东。由于持有如此巨大的股权,我们可以推断他们对公司未来有重要的控制力。当内部人员拥有公司中大量的股份时,这通常被视为一个良好的迹象,在这种情况下,我们很高兴看到一位公司内部人员具有这样的投入。相比之下,第二大和第三大股东持有的股票约为1.6%和1.5%。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

上海阿拉丁生物化学技术股份有限公司的内部人员拥有重要比例,内部人员在这家总价值27亿人民币的公司中持有12亿人民币的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有很多股份。您可以单击此处查看他们是否进行了买卖。

Insider Ownership Of Yanlord Land Group

仁恒置地集团的内部股权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Yanlord Land Group Limited. This gives them effective control of the company. That means they own S$605m worth of shares in the S$821m company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们的信息表明,内部人员拥有仁恒置地集团有限公司的股份超过一半。这使他们有效地控制公司。这意味着他们拥有8,210万新元的股份。这是相当有意义的投资。您可以在此处检查内部人员最近是否购买过这些股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 23% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公众(包括散户投资者)拥有该公司的23%股权,因此他们不容易被忽视。尽管该群体不能一呼百应,但肯定会对公司的运营产生实际影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Yanlord Land Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Yanlord Land Group you should know about.

在考虑拥有公司股份的不同群体之前,总是值得思考。但要更好地了解仁恒置地集团,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。考虑风险,例如。每个公司都有风险,我们已经发现仁恒置地集团的1个警告信号,您应该了解。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发