share_log

Here's Why Colgate-Palmolive (NYSE:CL) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly

Here's Why Colgate-Palmolive (NYSE:CL) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly

高露洁(纽交所:CL)为何能够负债负责任地进行管理
Simply Wall St ·  08/11 08:27

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Colgate-Palmolive Company (NYSE:CL) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

戴维·伊本(David Iben)说得很好:“波动率不是我们所关心的风险。我们关心的是避免资本的永久损失。”因此,当您考虑任何股票的风险时,需要考虑债务,因为过多的债务可能会使公司陷入困境。我们可以看到高露洁(NYSE:CL)在业务中使用债务。但真正问题在于这些债务是否会使公司变得风险高。

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

债务带来了什么风险?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

债务可以帮助业务,直到业务出现了无法借新的资本或自由现金流还债的问题。最终,如果公司无法履行偿还债务的法律义务,股东可能将一无所获。然而,更频繁(但仍然代价高昂)的情况是,公司必须以极低的价格发行股票,永久稀释股东的权益,以加强其资产负债表。当然,很多公司使用债务来资助成长,并没有任何负面后果。在考虑企业债务水平时,第一步是考虑现金流和债务的总和。

What Is Colgate-Palmolive's Net Debt?

高露洁的净债务是多少?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Colgate-Palmolive had US$8.68b in debt in June 2024; about the same as the year before. However, it does have US$1.34b in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$7.34b.

下面的图表显示高露洁于2024年6月拥有86.8亿美元的债务,大致与前一年相同。然而,它确实拥有13.4亿美元的现金来抵消这笔债务,从而产生净债务约73.4亿美元。

big
NYSE:CL Debt to Equity History August 11th 2024
NYSE:CL负债股本比历史数据2024年8月11日

A Look At Colgate-Palmolive's Liabilities

最新的资产负债表数据显示,高露洁应在一年内支付53.5亿美元的负债,之后的负债为106亿美元。相应的,企业拥有13.4亿美元的现金和18.3亿美元的应在12个月内到期的应收账款。所以其负债总额比现金和短期应收账款总和高达128亿美元。

The latest balance sheet data shows that Colgate-Palmolive had liabilities of US$5.35b due within a year, and liabilities of US$10.6b falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$1.34b in cash and US$1.83b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$12.8b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

考虑到高露洁市值为834亿美元,很难相信这些负债会构成多大的威胁。无论如何,我们认为值得关注其资产负债表的强度,因为它可能会随时间而变化。

Given Colgate-Palmolive has a humongous market capitalization of US$83.4b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time.

高露洁的净债务与息税折旧及摊销前利润为1.5,仅表明其轻度使用债务。其强大的息税盈利能力覆盖17.8倍,让我们更加放心。此外,高露洁在过去一年中EBIt增长了16%,这也增加了其管理债务的能力。当您分析债务时,需要明确关注资产负债表领域。但最终,企业的未来盈利能力将决定高露洁是否能够在未来加强资产负债表。因此,如果您专注于未来,可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师的盈利预测。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

为了比较一个公司的债务与其收益的关系,我们计算其净债务除以利息、税、折旧和摊销前的收益和利息前的收益(其利息覆盖率)。因此,我们考虑了债务的绝对数量以及支付的利率。

Colgate-Palmolive's net debt to EBITDA ratio of about 1.5 suggests only moderate use of debt. And its strong interest cover of 17.8 times, makes us even more comfortable. Also good is that Colgate-Palmolive grew its EBIT at 16% over the last year, further increasing its ability to manage debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Colgate-Palmolive can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

最后,企业需要自由现金流来偿还债务;仅依靠会计利润是不足的。因此,我们必须明确看到EBIt是否导致相应的自由现金流。在过去的三年中,高露洁生产了坚固的自由现金流,相当于其EBIt的70%,这与我们的预期相当。这种冰冷的现金意味着它可以在需要时减少债务。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, Colgate-Palmolive produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 70% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

好消息是,高露洁显然能够使用其EBIt支付利息支出,这使我们像毛绒绒的小狗对儿童一样感到高兴。而且好消息并没有止步于此,因为其将EBIt转化为自由现金流的能力也支持了这种印象!从更大的图景来看,我们认为高露洁使用债务似乎相当合理,而且我们并不担心它。毕竟,合理的杠杆可以提高股本回报率。在分析债务时,资产负债表领域显然是需要关注的领域。但是,不是所有的投资风险都存在于资产负债表中——远非如此。例如,高露洁仅有1个警示标志,我们认为您应该了解其中的风险。

Our View

我们的观点

The good news is that Colgate-Palmolive's demonstrated ability to cover its interest expense with its EBIT delights us like a fluffy puppy does a toddler. And the good news does not stop there, as its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow also supports that impression! Looking at the bigger picture, we think Colgate-Palmolive's use of debt seems quite reasonable and we're not concerned about it. After all, sensible leverage can boost returns on equity. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example - Colgate-Palmolive has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

最后,企业需要自由现金流来偿还债务;仅依靠会计利润是不足的。因此,我们必须明确看到EBIt是否导致相应的自由现金流。在过去的三年中,高露洁生产了坚固的自由现金流,相当于其EBIt的70%,这与我们的预期相当。这种冰冷的现金意味着它可以在需要时减少债务。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

归根结底,专注于没有净债务的公司往往更好。您可以访问我们的特别列表,其中包括所有表现出盈利增长轨迹的公司。这是免费的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发