share_log

The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed GDEV Inc. (NASDAQ:GDEV) Insiders Who Own 47% of the Company

The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed GDEV Inc. (NASDAQ:GDEV) Insiders Who Own 47% of the Company

最近的回撤一定让拥有公司47%股份的GDEV公司内部人士感到沮丧。(纳斯达克:GDEV)
Simply Wall St ·  08/12 06:25

Key Insights

主要见解

  • GDEV's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 63% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • GDEV显著的内部持有权表明了该公司扩张的内在利益。
  • 公司股份的63%由前2名股东持有。
  • 所有权研究结合过去的表现数据可以帮助更好地理解股票的机会。

If you want to know who really controls GDEV Inc. (NASDAQ:GDEV), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 47% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想知道谁真正控制了GDEV Inc. (NASDAQ:GDEV),那么您将不得不看一下它的股权注册表的构成。而持有最大份额的群体是拥有47%所有权的个人内部人员。换句话说,这个群体最可能获得最多(或失去最多)从投资该公司中获利。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 14%.

上周内部人员经历了最大的损失,因为该股下跌了14%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of GDEV.

在下面的表格中,我们放大了GDEV的不同所有权群体。

big
NasdaqGM:GDEV Ownership Breakdown August 12th 2024
纳斯达克:GDEV 所有权分布 2024年8月12日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About GDEV?

机构持股缺失说明了什么?可能有各种各样的原因,让我们更深入地了解为什么即使GDEV做得很好,机构也不会持有它的股票。通常,小型新上市的公司不会吸引基金经理的太多关注,因为大型基金经理不可能在该公司建立重要的头寸。也有可能,基金经理不持有该股票,因为他们并不认为它会表现良好。GDEV可能没有机构所寻求的过去业绩,或者他们仅仅是没有细致地研究过该业务。

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

我们不会看到机构投资者持有非常高风险、交易较少或非常小的公司的股票。虽然有时会看到大公司没有机构在注册表上,但这并不是特别普遍的情况。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. GDEV might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.

公司没有机构持股的原因有很多种。通常,小型新上市公司不会引起基金经理的注意,因为大型基金经理无法在公司中建立有意义的头寸。也有可能是基金经理不持有该股票,因为他们并不认为它的表现会很好。GDEV可能没有机构正在寻找的过去表现,或者他们可能没有仔细研究业务。

big
NasdaqGM:GDEV Earnings and Revenue Growth August 12th 2024
纳斯达克:GDEV营收增长和收入增长 2024年8月12日

GDEV is not owned by hedge funds. Everix Investments Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 41% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 22% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 16% by the third-largest shareholder. Andrey Fadeev, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

GDEV不是由对冲基金持有的。Everix Investments Limited目前是最大的股东,持有41%的流通股。为了更好地理解,第二大股东持有约22%的流通股,第三大股东持有16%的流通股。而第二大股东Andrey Fadeev也恰好是首席执行官。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

经过进一步挖掘,我们发现前两个股东共同控制了公司50%以上的股份,说明他们有相当大的影响力来影响公司的决策。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

虽然研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议以加深对股票预期表现的全面了解也是一个好习惯。虽然有部分分析师的覆盖,但该公司可能没有受到广泛的关注。因此,在未来可能会受到更多关注。

Insider Ownership Of GDEV

持股人的内部人员

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of GDEV Inc.. Insiders own US$215m worth of shares in the US$458m company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

GDEV的内部人员拥有公司价值21500万美元的股票。我们可以说这表明了与股东的契合度,但值得注意的是,该公司仍然很小;一些内部人员可能创立了这个业务。您可以在此处单击以查看这些内部人员是否已经购买或出售。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over GDEV. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

拥有12%的流通股的普通公众,主要包括个人投资者,对GDEV有一定的影响力。虽然占有这么大的股份,但如果决策不与其他大股东同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 41%, of the GDEV stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

私营企业拥有GDEV股票的41%。私有公司可能与相关方有关。有时内部人员通过持有私营公司的股份而不是以个人的身份参与公众公司。虽然很难得出任何概括性的结论,但也值得作为进一步研究的一个领域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - GDEV has 3 warning signs (and 2 which can't be ignored) we think you should know about.

尽管考虑拥有公司的不同群体是值得的,但有其他更重要的因素。例如承担风险的问题-我们认为您需要了解GDEV有3个警告标志(还有2个不能忽略的)。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发