Gemdale (SHSE:600383) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt
Gemdale (SHSE:600383) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt
Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Gemdale Corporation (SHSE:600383) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
沃伦·巴菲特曾经说过:“波动性和风险远非同义词。”因此,当你考虑某个股票的风险时,需要考虑债务,因为太多的债务可能会导致企业破产。我们可以看到,金地集团(SHSE:600383)在业务中确实使用了债务。但是,股东们是否应该担心它的债务使用情况?
When Is Debt A Problem?
什么时候负债才是一个问题?
Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
债务是帮助企业成长的工具,但如果企业无法偿还债权人,那么它就处于他们的掌控之下。资本主义的一部分是“创意毁灭”过程,失败的企业被无情地清算。然而,更频繁的(但仍然昂贵的)情况是企业不得不以折价发行股票,永久性稀释股东,才能支持其资产负债表。当然,债务可以是企业重要的工具,尤其是资本密集型企业。当我们考虑一个公司的债务使用情况时,首先要看现金和债务的总体情况。
What Is Gemdale's Net Debt?
金地集团的净债务是多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Gemdale had CN¥89.3b of debt in March 2024, down from CN¥118.0b, one year before. However, it also had CN¥24.4b in cash, and so its net debt is CN¥64.8b.
您可以点击下面的图表查看历史数字,但它显示,金地集团在2024年3月有893亿元的债务,比一年前的1180亿元减少。然而,它还有244亿元的现金,因此其净债务为648亿元。
How Strong Is Gemdale's Balance Sheet?
金地集团的资产负债表有多强?
According to the last reported balance sheet, Gemdale had liabilities of CN¥194.3b due within 12 months, and liabilities of CN¥57.4b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had CN¥24.4b in cash and CN¥98.1b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling CN¥129.2b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
根据最近公布的资产负债表,金地集团有1943亿元的短期负债,574亿元的长期负债。抵消这些负债,它有244亿元的现金和981亿元的应收账款,这些账款将在12个月内到期。因此,它的负债总额比其现金和短期应收账款加起来还多1292亿元。
This deficit casts a shadow over the CN¥15.1b company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we definitely think shareholders need to watch this one closely. At the end of the day, Gemdale would probably need a major re-capitalization if its creditors were to demand repayment.
这个亏损多达151亿元的公司股价面临着阴影,就像一个巨人屹立在普通人的头顶上。因此,我们认为股东们绝对需要密切关注这个股票。归根结底,如果金地集团的债权人要求偿还债务,它可能需要大规模重新融资。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
通过查看公司的净债务与利息、税、折旧、摊销前利润(EBITDA)之比以及它的利息费用(利息覆盖率)可以衡量一个公司的债务负担与收益能力。因此,我们考虑将债务与有无计算折旧和摊销费用的收益相对比。
Strangely Gemdale has a sky high EBITDA ratio of 14.5, implying high debt, but a strong interest coverage of 1k. So either it has access to very cheap long term debt or that interest expense is going to grow! Shareholders should be aware that Gemdale's EBIT was down 55% last year. If that decline continues then paying off debt will be harder than selling foie gras at a vegan convention. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Gemdale can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
奇怪的是,金地集团EBITDA比率高达14.5,表明负债高,但利息覆盖率强,达到了0.1万。因此,要么它有访问非常便宜的长期债务,要么利息支出将会增长!股东应注意,金地集团的EBIt去年下降了55%。如果这种下降趋势持续下去,偿还债务将比在素食主义者大会上卖鹅肝酱还要难。在分析债务时,资产负债表明显是需要关注的领域。但是,最终业务未来的盈利能力将决定金地集团能否随着时间推移加强其资产负债表。因此,如果您想了解专业人士的看法,您可能会发现我们的分析师利润预测免费报告很有趣。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last three years, Gemdale actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. That sort of strong cash conversion gets us as excited as the crowd when the beat drops at a Daft Punk concert.
最后,公司需要自由现金流来偿还债务,会计利润不足以实现这一点。因此,我们总是要检查EBIt中有多少被转化为自由现金流。在过去的三年中,金地集团实际上产生的自由现金流比EBIt多。这种强劲的现金转换方式让我们感到兴奋,就像达夫特朋克音乐会上的观众一样。
Our View
我们的观点
On the face of it, Gemdale's EBIT growth rate left us tentative about the stock, and its level of total liabilities was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But on the bright side, its interest cover is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. We're quite clear that we consider Gemdale to be really rather risky, as a result of its balance sheet health. So we're almost as wary of this stock as a hungry kitten is about falling into its owner's fish pond: once bitten, twice shy, as they say. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Gemdale (including 1 which is concerning) .
从表面上看,金地集团的EBIt增长率使我们对该股持观望态度,其总负债水平同样不如每年最繁忙的夜晚最冷清的一家餐厅吸引人。但好的一面是,它的利息覆盖率是一个不错的标志,这让我们更加乐观。我们非常清楚,由于其资产负债表健康状况,我们认为金地集团的风险实际上相当大。因此,我们对这个股票非常谨慎,就像饥饿的小猫对主人的鱼池一样谨慎:一旦咬了一口,就非常谨慎。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显而易见的开始区域。但最终,每个公司都可能存在超出资产负债表范围的风险。为此,您应该了解我们在金地集团发现的3个警告信号(其中1个是令人担忧的)。
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果您有兴趣投资能够在不负债的情况下增长利润的企业,请查看这份免费列表,其中列出了在资产负债表上拥有净现金的成长型企业。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。