share_log

RPM International Inc. (NYSE:RPM) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 82% of the Company

RPM International Inc. (NYSE:RPM) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 82% of the Company

机构投资者持有公司82%,RPm International Inc.(纽交所:RPM)备受青睐
Simply Wall St ·  08/13 09:19

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in RPM International implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 12 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 机构的持股明显意味着他们对公司股价有重大影响。
  • 前12名股东持有该公司51%的股份。
  • 最近由内部人士出售。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of RPM International Inc. (NYSE:RPM), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 82% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解RPm International Inc.(纽约证交所:RPM)真正掌控权的人,重要的是要了解业务的所有权结构。 持有公司最多股份的集团,确切地说是约82%的机构。 也就是说,如果股票上涨(或者有下行趋势),这个集团将会受益最多。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由于他们拥有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构所有权往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者来说。因此,拥有大量机构资金投资于公司往往被认为是一种令人向往的品质。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of RPM International.

在下面的图表中,我们聚焦于RPm International的不同所有权群体。

big
NYSE:RPM Ownership Breakdown August 13th 2024
纽约证交所RPm所有权分布2024年8月13日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About RPM International?

机构所有权对RPm International有什么影响?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

RPM International already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of RPM International, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

RPm International在股东名册上已经有了机构。 实际上,他们拥有公司的相当大的股份。 这表明专业投资者已经给予了一定的信任。 但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时候会犯错误投资,就像其他人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图卖出一只股票,很常见会出现股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查RPm International的过去收益轨迹(如下所示)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NYSE:RPM Earnings and Revenue Growth August 13th 2024
纽约证交所RPm收益和营收增长2024年8月13日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in RPM International. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 11%. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 10% of common stock, and Aristotle Capital Management, LLC holds about 7.2% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Frank Sullivan is the owner of 0.8% of the company's shares.

机构投资者拥有公司的超过50%,因此他们可能一起强烈影响董事会的决策。对于RPm International,对冲基金持有的股份不多。公司最大的股东是The Vanguard Group,拥有11%的股份。BlackRock,Inc.是第二大股东,拥有10%的普通股,而Aristotle Capital Management,LLC持有公司股票的约7.2%。此外,首席执行官Frank Sullivan拥有该公司股份的0.8%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

考虑到前12名股东拥有51%的股份,这意味着没有单一的股东拥有多数。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of RPM International

RPm International的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

We can see that insiders own shares in RPM International Inc.. Insiders own US$185m worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.

我们可以看到内部人员拥有RPm International Inc.的股份。内部人员持有价值1,850万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。我们有时会关注他们是否一直在购买或出售。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in RPM International. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

通常是个人投资者的普通公众持有RPm International 16%的股份。尽管这个群体不能决定公司的事务,但它肯定会对公司的经营产生实际影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand RPM International better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - RPM International has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

思考一家公司股权所属不同群体总是值得的。 但是,要更好地了解RPm International,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,要考虑的风险 - RPm International有1个预警信号,我们认为你应该知道。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发