Despite Selling Recently, Verrica Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ:VRCA) Insiders Own 38% Stake and Recent Decline Might Have Cost Them
Despite Selling Recently, Verrica Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ:VRCA) Insiders Own 38% Stake and Recent Decline Might Have Cost Them
Key Insights
主要见解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Verrica Pharmaceuticals' growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- The top 2 shareholders own 53% of the company
- Insiders have sold recently
- 内部人士似乎对verrica制药的增长持有既得利益,这可以从他们拥有的大量股权中看出。
- 前两大股东拥有该公司的53%股权。
- 近期内有内部人士出售股票
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Verrica Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ:VRCA), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 38% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
想要真正了解纳斯达克(NASDAQ:VRCA)谁掌握着公司的控制权,了解该公司的所有权结构是非常重要的。持有38%股份的个人内部人士拥有该公司的最多股权。换句话说,该组群体对其对公司的投资最有利(或最不利)。
Despite recent sales, insiders own the most shares in the company. As market cap fell to US$224m last week, they would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
尽管最近出售了部分股份,内部人士仍然持有公司最多的股份。随着市值在上周下跌至2.24亿美元,他们将面临比公司其他股东群体更大的损失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Verrica Pharmaceuticals, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究verrica制药的每一种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Verrica Pharmaceuticals?
机构拥有verrica制药股份,这意味着为这些机构服务的分析师们看好该股票。然而,和其他股民一样,他们也可能错误判断。当多家机构持股,就有可能发生“人挤人”的情况,当买进的做法行不通时,多方也可能会赶快抛售股票,而这种风险在没有产生增长历史的公司中更高。下图是verrica制药历年的收益和营业收入情况,但请注意,故事总会有更多情节。
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Verrica Pharmaceuticals. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Verrica Pharmaceuticals' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如您所见,机构投资者在verrica制药中占有相当的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。然而,最好谨慎依赖机构投资者所附带的所谓验证。他们也会犯错误。当多个机构拥有股票时,存在他们在一个“拥挤的交易”中的风险。当这种交易出现问题时,多个方可能会争相快速向外出售股票。这种风险在一个没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以看到verrica制药的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事还有更多内容。
Our data indicates that hedge funds own 9.4% of Verrica Pharmaceuticals. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Paul Manning is currently the company's largest shareholder with 36% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 17% and 9.4% of the stock.
我们的数据显示,对verrica制药持有9.4%的是对冲基金。这很有趣,因为对冲基金可以非常活跃和积极。许多人寻找中期催化剂,以推动股价上涨。巴尔·曼宁(Paul Manning)目前是该公司的最大股东,持有36%的流通股。相比之下,第二大和第三大股东持有约17%和9.4%的股份。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 53% stake.
股东注册表的更详细研究向我们展示了,通过他们的53%股份,前2个最大股东在公司中拥有相当大的所有权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究机构持股比例是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。同样可以通过研究分析师情绪来实现。由于相当多的分析师都关注着该股票,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。
Insider Ownership Of Verrica Pharmaceuticals
股权投资公司持有verrica制药的17%股权,这意味着股权投资公司在关键政策决策中可能具有影响力。有时我们会看到股权投资公司长期持股,但一般来说,它们的投资周期较短,而且不太投资于公共公司。一段时间后,它们可能会考虑卖出并在其他地方重新配置资金。
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Verrica Pharmaceuticals Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$224m, and insiders have US$85m worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起来内部人士拥有verrica制药的大量股份。它的市值仅为2240万美元,内部人士自己名下有8500万美元的股份。看到内部人员如此投资于公司是令人振奋的,最好检查这些内部人员最近是否一直在购买。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 18% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
除股东之外(包括零售投资者)拥有公司18%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这个团体可能无法少量披露信息,但它确定可以对公司的经营有真正的影响。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
Private equity firms hold a 17% stake in Verrica Pharmaceuticals. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
私募股权公司持有verrica制药17%的股份。这表明,他们在重要的政策决策中可能有影响力。一些投资者可能会被此鼓舞,因为私募股权有时能够鼓励有助于市场看到公司价值的策略。另一方面,这些持有者可能在将其推向公众后退出投资。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Verrica Pharmaceuticals better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Verrica Pharmaceuticals (of which 1 is significant!) you should know about.
始终考虑持有公司股份的不同群体是值得的。但为了更好地了解verrica制药,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如风险。每个公司都有风险,我们已经发现了verrica制药的三个预警信号(其中一个至关重要!),您应该知道。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。