Paysafe Limited's (NYSE:PSFE) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 11% Over the Past Week
Paysafe Limited's (NYSE:PSFE) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 11% Over the Past Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Paysafe's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 机构持有数量巨大意味着Paysafe的股票价格对它们的交易行为非常敏感。
- 前4大股东持有51%的业务股份
- 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。
A look at the shareholders of Paysafe Limited (NYSE:PSFE) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 31% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看Paysafe Limited (纽交所:PSFE)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最强大。拥有公司股份数量最多的集团,确切地说是约占31%的机构。换句话说,这个群体面临的上行潜力(或下行风险)最大。
And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 11% last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 75% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
结果,当该公司股票价格上涨11%时,机构投资者获得了最多的回报。一年的投资回报率目前为75%,上周的涨幅将会受到更多的欢迎。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Paysafe.
在下面的图表中,我们聚焦于Paysafe的不同股权所有人群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Paysafe?
机构持有情况对Paysafe有何指示?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that Paysafe does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Paysafe, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到Paysafe确实有机构投资者;而且他们持有公司的股份比例相当高。这表明该公司在投资界有一定的信誉度。然而,最好不要过于依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓认可。他们也会犯错。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,最好检查Paysafe以往的收益轨迹(如下)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Paysafe. PI Holdings Jersey Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 21% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 18% and 6.2% of the stock.
对于Paysafe而言,对冲基金的持股相对较少。目前,PI Holdings Jersey Limited是最大的股东,持有公司约21%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有该公司大约18%和6.2%的股份。
On looking further, we found that 51% of the shares are owned by the top 4 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
进一步观察后,我们发现前4大股东拥有51%的股份。换句话说,这些股东对公司决策具有重要影响力。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Paysafe
Paysafe的内部股权持有情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
We can see that insiders own shares in Paysafe Limited. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$39m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们可以看到内部人士持有Paysafe Limited的股份。内部人士持有的股份总值约为3900万美元,大多数人会视这种情况为真正的积极因素。看到内部人士做出这样的投资,确实是件好事。您可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否有购买。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 21% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Paysafe. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
拥有21%的股权,普通公众(主要是个人投资者)可以在Paysafe上发挥一定的影响力。尽管这种持股规模相当可观,如果决定不与其他大股东保持同步,可能无法改变公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
With an ownership of 23%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
拥有23%的私募股权投资公司正处于塑造以创造价值为重点的企业战略的位置。有些人可能会喜欢这个,因为私募股权有时是对管理层负责的活跃投资者。但也有时,这些私募股权会出售股票,并使公司上市。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
We can see that Private Companies own 21%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们可以看到私人公司拥有已发行股份的21%。从这个事实中很难得出任何结论,因此值得调查谁所拥有这些私人公司。有时,内部人员或其他相关方通过另外一个私人机构拥有公共公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
虽然考虑所有拥有一家公司的群体很重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜欢深入了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以免费访问该互动图表,了解其过去的盈利、营业收入和现金流。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。