share_log

EQT Corporation (NYSE:EQT) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 25% Loss Over the Past Year

EQT Corporation (NYSE:EQT) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 25% Loss Over the Past Year

经过过去一年的25%的跌幅后,EQt公司(纽交所:EQT)的机构投资者可能会对最近的收益感到满意。
Simply Wall St ·  08/18 08:21

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in EQT implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 机构对EQt的实质性持股意味着它们对该公司的股价具有重要影响
  • 前八大股东持有该业务的51%。
  • 最近由内部人士出售。

If you want to know who really controls EQT Corporation (NYSE:EQT), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 81% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道谁真正控制EQt公司(NYSE:EQT),则需要查看其股权登记册的构成。我们可以看到,机构拥有公司的大部分股权,占81%。换句话说,该群体面临最大的盈利潜力(或下行风险)。

Last week's US$624m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 25% losses.

上周62400万美元的市值增长可能会受到机构投资者的欣赏,尤其是在经历了25%的亏损后。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of EQT.

在下面的图表中,我们放大了EQt的不同所有权组之间的差异。

big
NYSE:EQT Ownership Breakdown August 18th 2024
纽交所EQt所有权分析报告2024年8月18日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About EQT?

机构所有权对EQT告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in EQT. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see EQT's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,机构投资者在EQt中拥有相当数量的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经研究了这支股票,并且喜欢它。但是像其他人一样,他们也可能错了。当多个机构拥有一支股票时,总有一个风险,即它们处于“拥挤的交易”中。当这样一笔交易出错时,多个方会竞相快速抛售股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更大。您可以在下面了解EQt的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容的。

big
NYSE:EQT Earnings and Revenue Growth August 18th 2024
纽交所EQt收益和营业收入增长2024年8月18日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in EQT. Our data shows that T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Wellington Management Group LLP and The Vanguard Group, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 9.0%.

投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有公司超过一半的股份,因此他们可以共同行使重大权力。我们注意到对冲基金在EQt中并没有有意义的投资。我们的数据显示,t. Rowe Price Group,Inc是持有14%流通股的最大股东。第二和第三大股东是惠灵顿管理集团有限公司和The Vanguard Group,Inc.,他们拥有9.0%的股份。

We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

内部人员拥有佛山蓝火箭电子股份有限公司的重要比例。内部人员在这家69亿元人民币的企业中持有25亿元人民币的股份,看到内部人员如此投资是很好的。如果这些内部人员最近一直在购买,那就值得检查。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。

Insider Ownership Of EQT

EQT内部所有权分析

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of EQT Corporation in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$120m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们的数据表明,内部人员以自己的名义拥有不到1%的EQt股份。由于规模如此之大,我们不希望内部人员持有大量股票。总的来说,他们拥有1.2亿美元的股票。看到至少有一些内部所有权总是好的,但可能值得检查这些内部人员是否一直在清仓。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公众,包括散户投资者,拥有该公司17%的股份,因此不容易被忽视。虽然该群体不能决定事情的走向,但肯定会在公司的运营方面产生真正的影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for EQT (of which 1 doesn't sit too well with us!) you should know about.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体的情况非常重要,但有其他更重要的因素。 例如风险。每个公司都有它们,我们发现EQt存在4个警示信号(其中1个不太好),您应该了解这些警示信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发