share_log

A Great Week That Adds to Federated Hermes, Inc.'s (NYSE:FHI) One-year Returns, Institutional Investors Who Own 83% Must Be Happy

A Great Week That Adds to Federated Hermes, Inc.'s (NYSE:FHI) One-year Returns, Institutional Investors Who Own 83% Must Be Happy

一个伟大的一周,为联合赫尔墨斯公司(纽交所:FHI)一年的回报增添-持有83%的机构投资者必定感到高兴
Simply Wall St ·  08/19 06:50

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Federated Hermes' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 13 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 机构持有大量股份意味着Federated Hermes股票价格容易受到其交易行为的影响。
  • 前13名股东占该公司50%的股份。
  • 近期内有内部人士出售股票

If you want to know who really controls Federated Hermes, Inc. (NYSE:FHI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 83% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道真正控制Federated Hermes, Inc. (纽交所:FHI)的是谁,那么您需要看其股权登记的构成。持有83%股权的机构是该公司最大的股东。换句话说,该群体会面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Last week's 3.0% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 6.7%.

上周3.0%的涨幅意味着机构投资者在公司展示强劲长期趋势的同时处于积极的一面。上周的收益进一步提高了目前股东的一年回报率,达到了6.7%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Federated Hermes.

让我们更加仔细地看看不同股东类型能告诉我们哪些有关Federated Hermes的信息。

big
NYSE:FHI Ownership Breakdown August 19th 2024
纽交所:FHI所有权分布2024年8月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Federated Hermes?

机构持股告诉我们关于Federated Hermes的什么信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

We can see that Federated Hermes does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Federated Hermes' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到,Federated Hermes确实有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司的相当一部分股票。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师们已经看过这只股票,并且他们喜欢它。但是,就像任何其他人一样,他们也可能错了。如果多个机构同时改变对某一股票的看法,其股价可能会快速下跌。因此,值得看看下面Federated Hermes的收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:FHI Earnings and Revenue Growth August 19th 2024
纽交所:FHI营收增长和收益增长2024年8月19日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Federated Hermes is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 11%. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and FMR LLC holds about 7.0% of the company stock.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此他们可能会强烈影响董事会的决策。Federated Hermes不属于对冲基金。该公司最大的股东是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有11%的股份。BlackRock, Inc.是第二大股东,持有普通股的11%,而FMR LLC持有该公司股票的约7.0%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

在我们的所有权数字中仔细看看,前13名股东拥有的股权合计为50%,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of Federated Hermes

Federated Hermes的内部股权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

We can see that insiders own shares in Federated Hermes, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$111m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我们可以看到,内部人士持有Federated Hermes, Inc的股份。这是一个相当大的公司,因此看到某些潜在有意义的联盟是正面的。在这种情况下,他们拥有大约1.11亿美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。大多数人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间存在利益的共同点。尽管如此,检查一下这些内部人是否一直在出售股票可能是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Federated Hermes. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公众,通常是个人投资者,持有Federated Hermes的13%的股份。这种所有权虽然相当可观,但如果决策和其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Federated Hermes you should know about.

尽管值得考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,注意风险。每家公司都有风险,我们已经发现了Federated Hermes的1个警示信号,您应该知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发