share_log

Private Companies Are GCL Energy Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:002015) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥601m

Private Companies Are GCL Energy Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:002015) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥601m

私营企业是协鑫能科有限公司(SZSE:002015)的最大股东,在市值下跌6.01亿元后受到冲击。
Simply Wall St ·  08/20 20:21

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant control over GCL Energy TechnologyLtd by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 3 shareholders own 54% of the company
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 私营公司对协鑫能源科技有限公司的严格控制意味着公众拥有更大的影响管理和治理相关决策的权力
  • 前三名股东拥有公司54%的股份
  • 公司过去的表现以及所有权数据可以使人们对企业前景有一个很好的了解

If you want to know who really controls GCL Energy Technology Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:002015), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 60% to be precise, is private companies. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制了协鑫能源技术有限公司, Ltd.(深圳证券交易所:002015),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。持有该公司股份最多的集团是私营公司,准确地说约为60%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

As a result, private companies as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥601m.

结果,在市值下降了60100万元人民币之后,私营公司作为一个整体承受了最大的损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of GCL Energy TechnologyLtd.

在下图中,我们放大了协鑫能源科技有限公司的不同所有权群体。

big
SZSE:002015 Ownership Breakdown August 21st 2024
SZSE: 002015 所有权明细 2024 年 8 月 21 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About GCL Energy TechnologyLtd?

机构所有权告诉我们关于协鑫能源科技有限公司的什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

GCL Energy TechnologyLtd already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of GCL Energy TechnologyLtd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

协鑫能源科技有限公司已经在股份登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看协鑫能源科技有限公司过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
SZSE:002015 Earnings and Revenue Growth August 21st 2024
SZSE:002015 收益和收入增长 2024 年 8 月 21 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in GCL Energy TechnologyLtd. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Asia Pacific Energy Fund Limited with 44% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.5% and 5.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我们注意到,对冲基金没有对协鑫能源科技有限公司进行有意义的投资。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大股东是亚太能源基金有限公司,已发行股份的44%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的5.5%和5.0%。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 54% stake.

对股东登记册的更详细研究表明,前三名股东通过其54%的股份拥有公司的大量所有权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。分析师对该股的报道很少,但报道不多。因此,它还有获得更多报道的余地。

Insider Ownership Of GCL Energy TechnologyLtd

协鑫能源科技有限公司的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.

我们注意到,我们的数据并未显示任何董事会成员个人持有股份。董事会成员不持有至少部分个人持股的情况很少见,因此我们的数据可能存在缺陷。一个不错的下一步是检查首席执行官的薪水是多少。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 33% stake in GCL Energy TechnologyLtd. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有协鑫能源科技有限公司33%的股份。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 60%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们可以看到,私人公司拥有已发行股份的60%。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过一家独立的私人公司对上市公司的股份拥有权益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for GCL Energy TechnologyLtd you should be aware of, and 1 of them is potentially serious.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。一个很好的例子:我们已经发现了你应该注意的协鑫能源科技有限公司的两个警告信号,其中一个可能很严重。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发