Chengdu RML Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301050) Market Cap Dropped CN¥382m Last Week; Individual Investors Bore the Brunt
Chengdu RML Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301050) Market Cap Dropped CN¥382m Last Week; Individual Investors Bore the Brunt
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over Chengdu RML Technology by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 14 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- 29% of Chengdu RML Technology is held by insiders
- 个人投资者对成都瑞迈拉科技的重大控制意味着普通公众对管理和治理相关决策有更多的影响力。
- 共有14名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,占有50%的所有权。
- 29%的成都瑞迈拉科技由内部人持有。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Chengdu RML Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301050), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 46% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
为了了解谁真正掌控着成都瑞迈拉科技股份有限公司(SZSE:301050),了解公司的所有权结构是很重要的。个体投资者持有46%的股份,是公司中最大的股东。换句话说,这个团体从他们对公司的投资中可能获得最多(或损失最多)的利益。
While the holdings of individual investors took a hit after last week's 4.9% price drop, insiders with their 29% also suffered.
个人投资者的持股在上周下跌4.9%后受到了打击,持股29%的内部人士也遭受了损失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Chengdu RML Technology.
在下图中,我们放大了成都锐迈科技的不同持股集团。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Chengdu RML Technology?
机构所有权对成都锐迈科技有何指示?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Chengdu RML Technology. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Chengdu RML Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
如您所见,机构投资者在成都锐迈科技中拥有相当大的股权。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时也会犯错误的投资,就像其他人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,股价大幅下跌是很常见的现象。因此,查看成都锐迈科技的过去盈利轨迹是很值得的(如下所示)。当然,还需要考虑其他因素。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Chengdu RML Technology. The company's largest shareholder is Jieru Deng, with ownership of 20%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.1% and 4.8% of the stock.
对成都RML科技而言,对冲基金并不持有太多股份。该公司最大的股东是邓杰如,持有20%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约9.1%和4.8%的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 14 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
经过更深入的挖掘,我们发现前14名股东合计持有该公司的50%股权,表明没有单一股东对该公司有重大控制权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
虽然研究一家公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪也是有意义的,以了解风向正在往哪里吹。虽然有一些分析师对该股票进行了覆盖,但随着时间的推移,它可能仍然会变得更加知名。
Insider Ownership Of Chengdu RML Technology
成都RML科技内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Chengdu RML Technology Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥2.2b worth of shares in the CN¥7.5b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起来内部人员拥有成都RML科技有限公司的很大比例的股份。内部人员在这个价值为75亿人民币的公司中拥有22亿人民币的股份,这相当有意义。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。您可以在这里查看是否有内部人员最近有买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 46% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Chengdu RML Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
占股46%的普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对成都RML科技有一定的影响力。虽然这种持股比例可能不足以左右政策决策的结果,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 12%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们的数据显示,私营公司持有该公司12%的股份。仅凭这个事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究一下这些私营公司的所有者是谁。有时候内部人员或者其他相关方可能通过一个单独的私营公司持有公共公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Chengdu RML Technology has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
查看公司股东的具体情况非常有趣。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。以风险为例 - 成都RML科技有一个警示标志,我们认为你应该知道。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。