Here's Why WNS (Holdings) (NYSE:WNS) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly
Here's Why WNS (Holdings) (NYSE:WNS) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. As with many other companies WNS (Holdings) Limited (NYSE:WNS) makes use of debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
有人说,作为投资者,波动性而不是债务更能代表风险,但沃伦·巴菲特曾著名地说过:'波动性与风险远非同义词。'因此,聪明的人知道,债务(通常与破产有关)是评估公司风险程度时非常重要的因素。与许多其他公司一样,WNS(控股)有限公司(纽交所股票代码:WNS)使用债务。但是,这些债务是否对股东构成了一个问题呢?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
债务何时有危险?
Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
债务是帮助企业增长的工具,但如果企业无法偿还债权人,那么它就处在他们的掌控之下。最终,如果公司不能履行其偿还债务的法律义务,股东可能会一无所获。然而,更常见的(但仍然痛苦的)情况是以低价筹集新的股权资本,从而永久性地稀释股东的权益。然而,通过取代稀释,债务可以成为企业的一种极好的工具,以在高回报率的情况下投资增长。当我们审查债务水平时,我们首先考虑现金和债务水平。
What Is WNS (Holdings)'s Debt?
WNS(控股)的债务是多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of June 2024 WNS (Holdings) had US$301.5m of debt, an increase on US$206.2m, over one year. On the flip side, it has US$301.2m in cash leading to net debt of about US$317.0k.
您可以点击下面的图表查看历史数据,但它显示,截至2024年6月,WNS(控股)有限公司的债务为301.50百万美元,较一年前的206.20百万美元有所增加。而另一方面,它有301.20百万美元的现金,因此净债务约为31.7百万美元。
How Strong Is WNS (Holdings)'s Balance Sheet?
WNS(控股)的资产负债表有多强?
The latest balance sheet data shows that WNS (Holdings) had liabilities of US$371.2m due within a year, and liabilities of US$389.5m falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$301.2m and US$250.5m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$209.0m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
最新的资产负债表数据显示,WNS(控股)一年内有3,712万美元的负债,之后有3,895万美元的到期负债。另一方面,它有3,012万美元的现金和2,505万美元的一年内到期应收款项。因此,其负债总额比现金和短期应收款项多2,090万美元。
Of course, WNS (Holdings) has a market capitalization of US$2.62b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time. Carrying virtually no net debt, WNS (Holdings) has a very light debt load indeed.
当然,WNS(控股)的市值为2.62亿美元,因此这些负债可能是可以管理的。然而,我们认为值得关注的是其资产负债表的实力,因为它可能会随时间而变化。WNS(控股)几乎没有净负债,负债负担非常轻。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
我们使用两个主要的比率来告诉我们相对于收益的债务水平。第一个是净债务除以利息、税、折旧和摊销前利润(EBITDA),而第二个是其利润前利息和税(EBIT)覆盖其利息费用的次数(或其利息覆盖率,简称)。因此,我们考虑与折旧和摊销费用相关的盈利以及没有相关费用的盈利相对于债务水平。
With net debt at just 0.0013 times EBITDA, it seems WNS (Holdings) only uses a little bit of leverage. But EBIT was only 6.9 times the interest expense last year, so the borrowing is clearly weighing on the business somewhat. The good news is that WNS (Holdings) has increased its EBIT by 8.8% over twelve months, which should ease any concerns about debt repayment. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if WNS (Holdings) can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
以净负债仅为EBITDA的0.0013倍来看,WNS(控股)似乎只使用了少量的杠杆。但去年的EBIT只是利息费用的6.9倍,所以借款显然对业务有一定的压力。好消息是,WNS(控股)过去十二个月净利润增长了8.8%,这应该可以缓解对债务偿还的担忧。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中了解到有关债务的大多数信息。但最终,企业未来的盈利能力将决定WNS(控股)能否随着时间的推移加强资产负债表。因此,如果您想了解专业人士的想法,您可能会发现这份关于分析师利润预测的免费报告非常有趣。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last three years, WNS (Holdings) recorded free cash flow worth a fulsome 92% of its EBIT, which is stronger than we'd usually expect. That positions it well to pay down debt if desirable to do so.
最后,企业需要自由现金流来偿还债务;会计利润是不够的。因此,我们当然需要看一下EBIT是否导致相应的自由现金流。在过去的三年中,WNS(控股)录得的自由现金流价值相当于其EBIT的92%,这比我们通常预期的要强。如果需要的话,这使其有能力偿还债务。
Our View
我们的观点
WNS (Holdings)'s conversion of EBIT to free cash flow suggests it can handle its debt as easily as Cristiano Ronaldo could score a goal against an under 14's goalkeeper. And that's just the beginning of the good news since its net debt to EBITDA is also very heartening. Zooming out, WNS (Holdings) seems to use debt quite reasonably; and that gets the nod from us. After all, sensible leverage can boost returns on equity. Over time, share prices tend to follow earnings per share, so if you're interested in WNS (Holdings), you may well want to click here to check an interactive graph of its earnings per share history.
WNS(控股)将EBIt转化为自由现金流,这表明它和C罗在14岁以下门将面前进球一样轻松地处理其债务。而这只是好消息的开始,因为其净债务对EBITDA的比率也非常令人欣慰。从长远来看,WNS(控股)似乎非常合理地使用债务;这对我们来说是可以的。毕竟,合理的杠杆可以提高股本回报率。随着时间的推移,股价往往会跟随每股收益,所以如果你对WNS(控股)感兴趣,你可能会想点击这里查看其每股收益历史的交互式图表。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
说到底,有时候更容易集中精力关注根本不需要债务的公司。读者可以免费访问零净债务增长股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。