Corteva, Inc.'s (NYSE:CTVA) One-year Returns Climbed After Last Week's 3.6% Gain, Institutional Investors Must Be Happy
Corteva, Inc.'s (NYSE:CTVA) One-year Returns Climbed After Last Week's 3.6% Gain, Institutional Investors Must Be Happy
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Corteva's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 17 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 前17名股东拥有该公司的50%股份。
- 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Corteva, Inc. (NYSE:CTVA), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 85% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
为了了解Corteva,Inc. (NYSE:CTVA)真正的控制者,了解该企业的所有权结构非常重要。我们可以看到,机构占据了该公司85%的所有权。换句话说,该机构面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$1.3b in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 9.9%.
上周道富银行的市值增加了13亿美元,对机构投资者来说情况正在好转。上周的收益还将进一步提升股东的一年回报率,目前为9.9%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Corteva.
让我们仔细看一下,不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于corteva的一些信息。
![1724263304261](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240822/42682740-0-3b173a72109d11da6e59a5c1b6a2ebdd.webp/bigjpg)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Corteva?
机构持股告诉我们关于corteva的一些信息
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that Corteva does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Corteva's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我们可以看到corteva确实有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司的一大部分股票。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这一事实,因为机构有时也会出现糟糕的投资,就像每个人都会一样。如果多家机构同时改变对一家股票的看法,可能会导致股价迅速下跌。因此值得查看corteva以下的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
![1724263306168](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240822/42682740-1-f6a146877878971c93604e9892a346ae.webp/bigjpg)
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Corteva is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.8% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.8% of the company stock.
投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有超过一半的公司股份,因此他们可以共同行使重大权力。Corteva不是由对冲基金持有的。我们的数据显示,The Vanguard Group,Inc.是最大的股东,持有11%的流通股份。BlackRock,Inc.是第二大股东,拥有7.8%的普通股,而道富银行全球投资者,Inc.持有公司股份约4.8%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 17 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
经过更深入的挖掘,我们发现前17名股东在该公司拥有50%的持股,这意味着没有单一股东对公司拥有显著的控制力。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Corteva
Corteva的内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our information suggests that Corteva, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$44m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们的信息显示,Corteva, Inc.内部人员持有公司不到1%的股份。作为一个如此庞大的公司,我们不会指望内部人员持有股票的比例很大。他们共持有4400万美元的股份。看到至少有一些内部人员持有股份总是件好事,但值得检查这些内部人员是否一直在抛售。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 15% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Corteva. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
拥有15%的股份,主要由个人投资者组成的普通公众对Corteva具有一定的影响力。虽然这一持股规模可能不足以左右政策决定的结果,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Corteva better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Corteva , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
在考虑一家公司的股东时,考虑不同的群体总是值得的。但是要更好地了解Corteva,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,投资风险这个永恒的威胁。我们已经发现了Corteva的一个警示标志,并且了解它们应该是你的投资过程的一部分。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。