Retail Investors Are Shenzhen Megmeet Electrical Co., LTD's (SZSE:002851) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥580m
Retail Investors Are Shenzhen Megmeet Electrical Co., LTD's (SZSE:002851) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥580m
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significant control over Shenzhen Megmeet Electrical by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 48% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- Insider ownership in Shenzhen Megmeet Electrical is 29%
- 零售投资者对麦格米特电气的重要控制意味着普通民众在管理和治理决策方面拥有更多的影响力。
- 前25名股东持有48%的业务。
- 麦格米特电气的内部所有权为29%。
If you want to know who really controls Shenzhen Megmeet Electrical Co., LTD (SZSE:002851), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 51% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道谁真正控制着深圳麦格米特电气有限公司(SZSE:002851),那么你需要看看它的股权登记簿的构成。拥有51%的股份,零售投资者在公司中拥有最多的股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨(或者如果有下降),该群体将获益最多(或者损失最多)。
While the holdings of retail investors took a hit after last week's 4.9% price drop, insiders with their 29% also suffered.
上周股价下跌4.9%,零售投资者的持股减少了,持有29%的内部人员也遭受了损失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Shenzhen Megmeet Electrical.
在下图中,我们放大了对深圳麦格米特的不同所有权群体的关注。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen Megmeet Electrical?
机构持有权告诉我们关于深圳麦格米特的什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shenzhen Megmeet Electrical. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Shenzhen Megmeet Electrical's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在深圳麦格米特拥有相当一部分股份。这可能表明公司在投资界有一定的信誉度。然而,最好谨慎依赖所谓的机构投资者带来的认可。他们有时也会犯错。当多个机构拥有一只股票时,总会存在它们在一个“拥挤的交易”中的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多方可能会竞相迅速抛售股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到深圳麦格米特的历史盈利和营业收入,但要记住,故事总是更复杂的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shenzhen Megmeet Electrical. With a 19% stake, CEO Yongsheng Tong is the largest shareholder. AEGON-Industrial Fund Management Co. Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 4.9% of common stock, and Perseverance Asset Management L.L.P. holds about 4.0% of the company stock.
对于深圳市麦格米特电气而言,对冲基金持有的股票并不多。首席执行官童永胜拥有19%的股份,是最大的股东。安邦安鼎工会基金管理有限公司是第二大股东,拥有该公司普通股的4.9%。坚持资产管理有限合伙公司持有该公司约4.0%的股票。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
对我们的所有权数据进行更深入的研究表明,前25名股东的持股总额不到注册表的一半,表明有一个小股东的大群体,其中没有单个股东拥有多数股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen Megmeet Electrical
深圳市麦格米特电气的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Shenzhen Megmeet Electrical Co., LTD. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful CN¥3.3b stake in this CN¥11b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
根据我们最新的数据显示,麦格米特电气有限公司的内部人士拥有合理比例的股份。有意思的是,内部人士在这家110亿元的企业中拥有约33亿元的股权。大多数人会说,特别是在这样规模的公司中,这显示了与股东的良好一致性。点击这里查看那些内部人士是否一直在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 51% of Shenzhen Megmeet Electrical shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
普通公众,主要是个人投资者,共同持有麦格米特电气公司51%的股份。这种所有权水平使来自广大公众的投资者在决定关键政策方面具有一定的影响力,如董事会成员构成、高管薪酬和股息支付比例。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Shenzhen Megmeet Electrical (at least 1 which is a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
在考虑公司的不同股东群体之际,也有其他更重要的因素需要考虑。举个例子,投资风险这个不可忽视的威胁。我们发现了麦格米特电气存在三个预警信号(其中至少有一个比较不好),了解这些信号应该是你投资过程的一部分。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。