The Cigna Group (NYSE:CI) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 89%
The Cigna Group (NYSE:CI) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 89%
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Cigna Group's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 16 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 道富银行的股价对机构的交易行为非常敏感,意味着机构的持股比例非常高。
- 16个投资者拥有该公司的大多数股份,占有51%的所有权。
- 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。
Every investor in The Cigna Group (NYSE:CI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 89% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位投资者都应该知道纽交所信诺集团(NYSE:CI)最重要的股东群体。机构持有公司89%的股份,占据了最大的份额。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将获益最多(或者如果市场下跌,损失最多)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
考虑到机构持有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构持股往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者。因此,机构投资者投资公司的大量资金通常是对其未来的巨大信任。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Cigna Group.
在下面的图表中,我们放大显示了信诺集团的不同所有权群体。
![1724322471647](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240822/42725978-0-26a8637cf6439ee4ac5775865e6cd135.webp/bigjpg)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cigna Group?
机构所有权告诉我们关于信诺集团的什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。
Cigna Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Cigna Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
信诺集团已经在股份注册表上有机构。实际上,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。然而,最好不要过于依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓认可。他们也会犯错误。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,值得检查信诺集团的过去收益轨迹(如下所示)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
![1724322472856](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240822/42725978-1-4ad5ee079dc7810ed74a4eabf07b3291.webp/bigjpg)
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Cigna Group. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.4%. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.5% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.6% of the company stock.
机构投资者拥有公司超过50%的股份,因此他们可能会强烈影响董事会的决定。我们注意到对冲基金在信诺集团中没有实质性投资。公司最大股东是先锋集团,持有9.4%的股份。黑石集团是第二大股东,拥有8.5%的普通股,全球道富银行注册资本管理有限公司持有公司股份的约4.6%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 16 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
经过更深入的挖掘,我们发现前16名股东在该公司的拥有权占比为51%,这意味着没有单一股东对公司拥有重大控制权。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。
Insider Ownership Of Cigna Group
信诺集团内部股权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of The Cigna Group in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$331m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们的数据显示,信诺集团股东以自己的名义持有不到1%的股份。这是一家非常大的公司,因此看到内部股东拥有公司的大部分股份可能会让人感到惊讶。尽管他们持有的股份不到1%,但我们可以看到董事会成员共同持有价值3,3100万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。看到至少有一些内部股东持有股份总是好事,但值得注意的是这些内部人士是否一直在抛售。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Cigna Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
拥有10%的股权,主要由个人投资者构成的普通大众对信诺集团有一定程度的影响力。虽然这一持股比例可能不足以左右政策决策朝着他们的方向,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Cigna Group you should be aware of.
我发现知道一家公司的真正所有者是非常有趣的。但要真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。举个例子:我们发现《信诺》存在3个警示信号,你应该注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。