share_log

Following a 7.7% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (NYSE:EW) Institutional Owners

Following a 7.7% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (NYSE:EW) Institutional Owners

经历去年下降了7.7%后,最近的收益可能会让爱德华生命科学公司(纽交所:EW)的机构所有者感到满意
Simply Wall St ·  08/22 08:38

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Edwards Lifesciences' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 23 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 考虑到机构对该股票持有大量股份,爱德华生命科学的股价可能受到他们交易决定的影响
  • 23位最大股东持有General Mills公司50%的业务。
  • 近期内有内部人士出售股票

If you want to know who really controls Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (NYSE:EW), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 86% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想知道谁真正控制着爱德华生命科学公司(纽交所:EW),那么您需要看其股份登记的构成。拥有最大股份的是机构,持股比例为86%。换句话说,这个群体可能会从对该公司的投资中获得最大收益(或损失最大)。

Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 5.4% increase in the share price after a year of 7.7% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.

年底的 7.7% 损失后,机构投资者很可能对上周股价上涨 5.4% 感到欢迎,这可能意味着回报率可能开始走高。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Edwards Lifesciences, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入了解 Edwards Lifesciences 的每种股东,从下面的图表开始。

1724330332121
NYSE:EW Ownership Breakdown August 22nd 2024
纽交所:EW 所有权拆分 2024 年 8 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Edwards Lifesciences?

机构持股情况告诉我们关于Edwards Lifesciences的什么信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Edwards Lifesciences. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Edwards Lifesciences' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所见,机构投资者对 Edwards Lifesciences 持有相当数量的股份,这表明在专业投资者中具有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时也会犯错误的投资,就像其他人一样。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,股价可能会迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下 Edwards Lifesciences 的下面的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

1724330333492
NYSE:EW Earnings and Revenue Growth August 22nd 2024
纽交所:EW盈利和营业收入增长2024年8月22日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Edwards Lifesciences is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 8.9% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.5% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.3% of the company stock.

投资者应该注意,机构实际上拥有超过公司一半的股份,因此他们可以共同行使重大影响力。爱德华生命科学并非由对冲基金拥有。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是先锋集团,持有公司8.9%的股份。黑石集团持有公司8.5%的普通股,道富银行全球货币机构持有公司约4.3%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 23 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过进一步了解,我们发现前23名股东在公司中拥有50%的股权,这表明没有单一股东对该公司有显著控制。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我们的数据表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。单单从这个事实上很难得出任何结论,因此它值得研究谁拥有这些私人公司。有时内部人或其他相关方通过单独的私营公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of Edwards Lifesciences

Edwards Lifesciences的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Edwards Lifesciences Corporation in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$371m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

根据我们的数据,内部持有的爱德华生命科学公司的股票不到1%。由于规模很大,我们不会期望内部持有大比例的股票。他们共持有37100万美元的股票。可以点击这里查看内部人是否进行了买卖。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Edwards Lifesciences. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

占据13%的所有权的是广大的公众,主要是个人投资者,他们对爱德华生命科学的影响力有一定程度的影响。虽然这个群体不能直接掌握决策权,但肯定对公司的运行产生了真实的影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

虽然考虑所有拥有一家公司的群体很重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜欢深入了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以免费访问该互动图表,了解其过去的盈利、营业收入和现金流。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发