share_log

CEO Huaigang Lei, Shanghai Ruking Technologies Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301525) Largest Shareholder Sees Value of Holdings Go Down 11% After Recent Drop

CEO Huaigang Lei, Shanghai Ruking Technologies Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301525) Largest Shareholder Sees Value of Holdings Go Down 11% After Recent Drop

上海如鲲科技有限公司(SZSE:301525)的首席执行官雷怀刚是最大的股东,在最近的下跌后,持股的价值下降了11%。
Simply Wall St ·  08/22 20:20

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Shanghai Ruking Technologies' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 上海如金科技的重要内部持股表明了公司扩张的固有利益。
  • 前6名股东持有公司51%的股份。
  • 所有权研究结合过去的表现数据可以帮助更好地理解股票的机会。

A look at the shareholders of Shanghai Ruking Technologies Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301525) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 48% to be precise, is individual insiders. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看上海如金科技有限公司(SZSE:301525)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最强大。公司中持有最多股份的群体,准确来说,约占48%,是个人内部持股者。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下跌风险)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 11%.

上周,内部人士遭受了最大的损失,因为该股票下跌了11%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shanghai Ruking Technologies, beginning with the chart below.

让我们更深入地了解上海如昂科技的每种所有者类型,首先从下面的图表开始。

1724372402758
SZSE:301525 Ownership Breakdown August 23rd 2024
SZSE:301525所有权分解2024年8月23日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Ruking Technologies?

机构持股给我们关于上海如昂科技的什么样的信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shanghai Ruking Technologies. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Shanghai Ruking Technologies' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,机构投资者在上海如昂科技中占有相当大的股份。这可能意味着公司在投资界拥有一定的信誉。然而,对于依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓验证,最好保持警惕。他们有时候也会犯错误。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的观点,你可能会看到股价急剧下跌。因此,值得看一下上海如昂科技的历史收入数据。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

1724372403868
SZSE:301525 Earnings and Revenue Growth August 23rd 2024
SZSE:301525 2024年8月23日的收益和营业收入增长

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Shanghai Ruking Technologies. The company's CEO Huaigang Lei is the largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 13% and 9.2% of the stock.

我们注意到,对于上海如京科技来说,对冲基金没有意义的投资。该公司的首席执行官雷怀刚是最大的股东,持有17%的股份。相比之下,第二大和第三大股东持有约13%和9.2%的股票。

We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,前6大股东持有超过一半的股份登记簿,有一些较小的股东来平衡较大股东的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

虽然研究公司的机构持股可以增加研究价值,但研究分析师建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一个好习惯。该股票的一些分析人士需要更多的关注时间。

Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Ruking Technologies

上海如京科技的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Shanghai Ruking Technologies Co., Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥2.0b stake in this CN¥4.1b business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

根据我们的信息,内部人员在上海瑞康科技有限公司持有重要股权。内部人员在这家价值4100百万元的企业中拥有20亿元的股份。这可能意味着创始人仍然拥有大量股份。你可以点击这里查看他们是否一直在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 41% stake in Shanghai Ruking Technologies. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通投资者通常指个体投资者,他们在上海瑞康科技的持股比例为41%。虽然这个群体可能不能直接决策,但它肯定对公司的运营产生了真正的影响。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 4.3%, of the Shanghai Ruking Technologies stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

上海如京股份私人公司持有4.3%的股份。 私人公司可能是关联方。 有时候内部人员会通过持有私人公司的方式对上市公司产生兴趣,而不是以个人的身份。虽然很难得出任何广泛的结论,但值得作为进一步研究的领域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Shanghai Ruking Technologies has 2 warning signs (and 1 which shouldn't be ignored) we think you should know about.

虽然考虑到拥有公司的不同团体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。以风险为例-上海如京科技有2个警示信号(以及1个不容忽视的警示信号)我们认为你应该知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发