With 83% Ownership of the Shares, MSA Safety Incorporated (NYSE:MSA) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
With 83% Ownership of the Shares, MSA Safety Incorporated (NYSE:MSA) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies MSA Safety's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Insiders have sold recently
- 机构持有份额极高意味着 msa safety 的股价对他们的交易行为非常敏感
- 总共有9个投资者持有该公司50%的股权。
- 近期内有内部人士出售股票
If you want to know who really controls MSA Safety Incorporated (NYSE:MSA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 83% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果您想知道谁真正控制着 MSA Safety Incorporated(纽交所:MSA),那么您就必须看看它的股东名册的构成。我们可以看到,机构在公司中拥有绝对的大部分,占有 83%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,这个团体将获益最大(或者如果出现下行,则损失最大)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
因为机构所有者拥有庞大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策往往带有很大的分量,尤其是对于个人投资者来说。因此,机构投资在一家公司中的大量资金通常被视为一个积极因素。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of MSA Safety.
在下面的图表中,我们放大了MSA Safety的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About MSA Safety?
机构所有权告诉我们关于MSA Safety的什么?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in MSA Safety. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of MSA Safety, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在MSA Safety拥有相当大的股份。这意味着那些机构的分析师已经研究过这支股票并且他们喜欢它。但是,就像其他人一样,他们也可能是错误的。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图卖出一支股票,股价可能会出现大幅下跌,这种情况并不少见。因此,值得检查MSA Safety过去的收益轨迹(如下所示)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in MSA Safety. Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.7% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 8.2% of the company stock.
机构投资者拥有公司超过50%的股份,所以他们可能会强烈影响董事会的决策。对安全MSA而言,对冲基金持有的股份不多。Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP目前是最大的股东,持有公司12%的流通股。第二大股东是The Vanguard Group,持有公司9.7%的普通股,而BlackRock,持有公司约8.2%的股份。
We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我们还观察到,前9大股东持有超过股份注册的一半,还有一些小股东平衡大股东的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司机构所有权数据是有意义的,但了解分析师的情绪也很有意义,以了解市场的走向。因为有很多分析师正在跟踪这个股票,所以看看他们的预测可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of MSA Safety
MSA Safety内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in MSA Safety Incorporated. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$376m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们可以报告,MSA Safety Incorporated的内部人员确实持有股份。这是一家相当大的公司,因此看到一些潜在的对齐是非常积极的。在这种情况下,他们持有价值约37600万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。如果您想探索内部人员对齐问题,您可以点击此处查看内部人员是否一直在买入或者卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 12% stake in MSA Safety. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众,通常是个人投资者,在MSA Safety持有12%的股份。尽管这种所有权规模相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand MSA Safety better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for MSA Safety that you should be aware of.
了解一家公司的股权结构,通常都是很有意义的。但是为了更好地理解MSA Safety,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们已经发现了MSA Safety的2个警告信号,您应该注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。