Positive Week for Biomea Fusion, Inc. (NASDAQ:BMEA) Institutional Investors Who Lost 53% Over the Past Year
Positive Week for Biomea Fusion, Inc. (NASDAQ:BMEA) Institutional Investors Who Lost 53% Over the Past Year
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Biomea Fusion implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 6 investors have a majority stake in the company with 54% ownership
- Insiders have bought recently
- 机构对Biomea Fusion的实质性持股意味着他们对该公司的股价有重要影响力。
- 共有6名投资者持有该公司的大部分股份,拥有54%的所有权。
- 内部人士最近购买了股票。
A look at the shareholders of Biomea Fusion, Inc. (NASDAQ:BMEA) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 51% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
观察Biomea Fusion, Inc. (纳斯达克:BMEA)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最强大。占有51%的股权的是机构。换句话说,该机构面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
After a year of 53% losses, last week's 32% gain would be welcomed by institutional investors as a possible sign that returns might start trending higher.
在连续亏损53%一年之后,上周32%的收益可能被机构投资者视为一种可能的迹象,表明回报可能会开始上升。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Biomea Fusion, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入研究Biomea Fusion的每一种所有者,首先从下面的图表开始。
![1724503740196](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240824/42826591-0-ac692f3c7031c87580880f90319037ef.webp/bigjpg)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Biomea Fusion?
机构持股给我们关于Biomea Fusion的哪个信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that Biomea Fusion does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Biomea Fusion, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到Biomea Fusion确实有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司的大部分股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时也会犯投资失误,就像其他人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者尝试在同一时间卖出股票,股价大幅下跌是很常见的。因此,值得检查Biomea Fusion过去的盈利趋势(如下所示)。当然,也要考虑其他因素。
![1724503741723](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240824/42826591-1-d77021556b1169c7085f4c4d3fccd842.webp/bigjpg)
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It looks like hedge funds own 16% of Biomea Fusion shares. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. FMR LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.9% and 9.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Thomas Butler directly holds 6.9% of the total shares outstanding.
由于机构投资者拥有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会很可能需要注意他们的偏好。这似乎是因为对冲基金拥有Biomea Fusion股份的16%,这很有趣,因为对冲基金可能非常活跃和积极。许多对冲基金寻找中期的催化剂,这将推动股价上涨。FMR LLC目前是该公司最大的股东,持有15%的流通股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有流通股份的9.9%和9.7%。此外,该公司的首席执行官托马斯·巴特勒(Thomas Butler)直接持有总流通股份的6.9%。
We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 54% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我们进行了更深入的调查,发现前6大股东大约占注册股份的54%,这意味着除了较大的股东,还有一些较小的股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司机构所有权数据是有意义的,但了解分析师的情绪也很有意义,以了解市场的走向。因为有很多分析师正在跟踪这个股票,所以看看他们的预测可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Biomea Fusion
Biomea Fusion的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Biomea Fusion, Inc.. Insiders have a US$32m stake in this US$249m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.
我们最新的数据显示,内部人士在Biomea Fusion, Inc.拥有相当比例的股权。内部人士在这家价值2.49亿美元的公司中持有3200万美元的股份。这可能意味着创始人仍然拥有很多股份。您可以点击此处查看他们是否一直在买卖。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公众——包括零售投资者——在公司中拥有11%的股份,因此不容易被忽略。虽然持股规模相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,这可能不足以改变公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 9.7%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们的数据显示,私人公司持有该公司9.7%的股份。单凭这个事实很难得出任何结论,所以值得研究一下谁拥有这些私人公司。有时,内部人员或其他相关方可能通过独立的私人公司持有公共公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Biomea Fusion (at least 3 which are significant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
虽然考虑到拥有公司的不同群体是很有价值的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,投资风险这个长期存在的魔鬼。我们已经确定了Biomea Fusion的4个警示信号(至少3个是重要的),了解它们应该是你投资过程的一部分。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。