Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ:HOOD) With 65% Ownership
Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ:HOOD) With 65% Ownership
Key Insights
主要见解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Robinhood Markets' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 13 shareholders own 50% of the company
- 15% of Robinhood Markets is held by insiders
- 考虑到机构在股票中所占的大部分股权,罗宾汉市场的股价可能会受到他们交易决策的影响。
- 前13名股东占该公司50%的股份。
- 罗宾汉市场15%的股份由内部持有。
A look at the shareholders of Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ:HOOD) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 65% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看一下罗宾汉市场股份的股东,可以告诉我们哪个群体最具影响力。(纳斯达克:HOOD). 机构拥有65%的股份,在公司中占据最大股权。换句话说,该群体从对公司的投资中最有可能获得最多(或者失去最多)
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$1.0b in market cap last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 100% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上周该公司市值增加了10亿美元,机构投资者的情况正在好转。目前的投资回报率为100%,上周的增长无疑是受欢迎的。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Robinhood Markets.
让我们更仔细地看看股东的不同类型能告诉我们关于罗宾汉市场的什么。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Robinhood Markets?
机构投资者的持股情况对我们关于罗宾汉市场有何启示?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
We can see that Robinhood Markets does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Robinhood Markets' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我们可以看到罗宾汉市场确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时也会犯错误的投资,就像其他人一样。当多个机构持有一只股票时,总会存在它们的交易被'拥挤'的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多个方面可能会竞相快速卖出股票。这种风险在一个没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以在下面查看罗宾汉市场的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住故事总会更加复杂。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Robinhood Markets. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Robinhood Markets' case, its Top Key Executive, Baiju Bhatt, is the largest shareholder, holding 7.4% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.8% and 6.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Vladimir Tenev is also a Chairman of the Board, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
机构投资者拥有公司超过50%的股份,所以他们可以对董事会决策产生很大影响。我们注意到对冲基金对Robinhood Markets没有重大投资。行动胜过言辞,当内部人持有公司的大量股份时,我们认为这是个好迹象。在Robinhood Markets的案例中,其最高主管Baiju Bhatt是最大的股东,持有7.4%的流通股份。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有流通股份的6.8%和6.4%。有趣的是,第三大股东Vladimir Tenev也是董事会主席,再次表明公司的顶级股东之间存在强大的内部持股权。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
在我们的所有权数字中仔细看看,前13名股东拥有的股权合计为50%,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股权。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。
Insider Ownership Of Robinhood Markets
Robinhood Markets的内部持股权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Robinhood Markets, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$18b, and insiders have US$2.6b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
Robinhood Markets, Inc.似乎很多股份由内部持有。它的市值仅为180亿美元,内部持有26亿美元的股份。这相当可观。大多数人都会很高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。您可能希望查看最近内部交易的免费图表。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Robinhood Markets. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
通常公众持有20%的股份,主要由个人投资者组成,对Robinhood Markets有一定的影响力。虽然这种所有权可能还不足以影响政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我觉得查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
很多人觉得深入了解一家公司过去的表现是有用的。您可以访问此详细的过去收益、营业收入和现金流量图。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。