SentinelOne, Inc.'s (NYSE:S) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 9.0% Over Last Week
SentinelOne, Inc.'s (NYSE:S) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 9.0% Over Last Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies SentinelOne's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 15 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 机构拥有的股份比例较高意味着 SentinelOne 的股票价格对他们的交易行为非常敏感。
- 共有15名投资者拥有该公司的多数股份,拥有50%的所有权。
- 内部人员最近一直在卖出。
A look at the shareholders of SentinelOne, Inc. (NYSE:S) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 75% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看 SentinelOne, Inc. (纽交所:S) 的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最有权势。机构拥有75%的股份,占据了该公司的最多股份。换句话说,这个群体在他们对该公司的投资中可能得到最多的利益(或承受最大的损失)。
Last week's 9.0% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 52% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
上周的9.0%的涨幅表明,机构投资者在公司展示长期强劲趋势的同时,也是获得正面收益的一方。股东的一年回报率目前为52%,而上周的涨幅更是锦上添花。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about SentinelOne.
让我们更仔细地看一下,不同类型的股东对SentinelOne有什么样的提示。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SentinelOne?
机构持股给我们关于SentinelOne的什么信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in SentinelOne. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of SentinelOne, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
如你所见,机构投资者在SentinelOne拥有相当一部分股份。这表明在专业投资者中,该公司具有一定的信誉。但仅仅依靠这个事实是不足够的,因为机构也会犯错,就像其他人一样。如果有两家大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,股价大幅下跌是很常见的。因此,检查SentinelOne的过去盈利轨迹是值得的(如下所示)。当然,还要记住还有其他因素要考虑。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in SentinelOne. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.1% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.2% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that Tomer Weingarten, the CEO has 1.5% of the shares allocated to their name.
机构投资者拥有公司超过50%的股份,因此他们可能会强烈影响董事会的决定。我们注意到对冲基金在SentinelOne没有实质性投资。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc. 是最大的股东,持有公司9.1%的流通股。第二大股东持有约7.7%的流通股,第三大股东持有6.2%的流通股。此外,我们发现首席执行官Tomer Weingarten持有公司1.5%的股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
仔细观察我们的股权拆分数据表明,前15大股东持有的股权总和为50%,这意味着没有任何单一股东拥有多数股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of SentinelOne
SentinelOne的内部持股情况
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
We can see that insiders own shares in SentinelOne, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$179m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们可以看到SentinelOne, Inc.的内部股东持有股份。作为一个相当大的公司,能够看到一些重要的关联通常是积极的。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约17900万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。看到内部股东投资达到这个水平是很好的。您可以在这里查看是否有内部人士最近进行了买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in SentinelOne. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公众,通常是个人投资者,在SentinelOne持有15%的股份。尽管这种所有权的规模不足以左右政策决策的结果,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Private Equity Ownership
股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。
Private equity firms hold a 7.7% stake in SentinelOne. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
股权投资公司持有SentinelOne 7.7%的股份。这意味着他们可以在关键政策决策方面发挥影响力。一些投资者可能会对此感到满意,因为股权投资公司有时能够鼓励市场认识到公司的价值并采取相应策略。另一方面,这些持有人可能在公司上市后退出投资。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand SentinelOne better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for SentinelOne you should be aware of.
总是值得考虑公司的股东群体。但要更好地理解SentinelOne,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。一个例子是我们发现SentinelOne存在3个警示信号,你应该注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。