share_log

Is ResMed (NYSE:RMD) A Risky Investment?

Is ResMed (NYSE:RMD) A Risky Investment?

瑞思迈(纽交所:RMD)是一个高风险的投资吗?
Simply Wall St ·  08/26 08:27

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that ResMed Inc. (NYSE:RMD) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

沃伦·巴菲特曾经说过:“波动性与风险远非相同。” 当我们评估一家公司的风险性时,关注其资产负债表是很自然的,因为债务往往在企业倒闭时扮演了重要角色。我们可以看到瑞思迈股份有限公司(纽交所:RMD)在业务中使用了债务。但真正的问题是这些债务是否给公司增加风险。

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

为什么债务会带来风险?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

一般来说,当公司无法通过筹集资本或使用自身现金流轻松偿还债务时,债务才真正成为一个问题。最终,如果公司无法履行偿还债务的法律义务,股东可能一无所获。虽然这种情况并不常见,但我们经常看到举债公司因放贷人迫使其以低于市场价的价格筹集资本而永久稀释股东。当然,债务对于企业来说也可以是一种重要的工具,尤其是对于资本密集型企业而言。当我们考虑公司使用债务时,我们首先将现金和债务放在一起看。

What Is ResMed's Net Debt?

瑞思迈的净债务是多少?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that ResMed had debt of US$707.2m at the end of June 2024, a reduction from US$1.44b over a year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$238.4m, its net debt is less, at about US$468.9m.

下面的图片,点击可以查看更多细节,显示瑞思迈于2024年6月底的债务为7,072百万美元,较一年前的14.4亿美元有所减少。然而,由于其有2,384百万美元的现金储备,其净债务少了约4,689百万美元左右。

1724675259452
NYSE:RMD Debt to Equity History August 26th 2024
纽交所:RMD的债务权益历史数据,截至2024年8月26日。

How Healthy Is ResMed's Balance Sheet?

ResMed的资产负债表如何?

According to the last reported balance sheet, ResMed had liabilities of US$910.7m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$1.10b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of US$238.4m and US$837.3m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$932.7m.

根据最近公布的资产负债表,ResMed有91070万美元的短期负债,11亿美元的长期负债。另一方面,它有23840万美元的现金和83730万美元的应收账款。所以它的负债超过了现金和(短期)应收账款的总和,金额为93270万美元。

Of course, ResMed has a titanic market capitalization of US$33.3b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse. Carrying virtually no net debt, ResMed has a very light debt load indeed.

当然,ResMed拥有令人惊人的333亿美元的市值,所以这些负债可能是可控的。话虽如此,显然我们应继续监控其资产负债表,以防情况变坏。ResMed几乎没有净债务,负债负担非常轻。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

为了对公司的债务相对于其收益进行规模适应,我们计算其净债务与利息、税、折旧和摊销前收益(EBITDA)之比及其税前收益(EBIT)与利息支出之比(利息保障倍数)。因此,我们既考虑到不包括折旧和摊销费用在内的收益,又包括折旧和摊销费用的收益相对于债务。

ResMed's net debt is only 0.31 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 30.3 times the size. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. Also positive, ResMed grew its EBIT by 20% in the last year, and that should make it easier to pay down debt, going forward. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if ResMed can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

ResMed的净债务仅为其EBITDA的0.31倍。而且其EBIT轻松覆盖了利息费用,达到了30.3倍的规模。所以我们对其非常保守地使用债务感到相当放心。此外,ResMed在过去一年中的EBIT增长了20%,这将使其更容易偿还债务。当你分析债务时,资产负债表显然是需要重点关注的领域。但最终,企业未来的盈利能力将决定ResMed是否能够随着时间的推移加强其资产负债表。所以,如果你关注未来,你可以查看这份免费的分析师盈利预测报告。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. During the last three years, ResMed produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 58% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

但我们的最后考虑也很重要,因为一家公司不能用虚拟利润偿还债务;它需要冷酷无情的现金。所以我们总是检查有多少EBIT转化为自由现金流。在过去的三年中,ResMed产生了稳固的自由现金流,相当于其EBIT的58%,与我们的预期相符。这笔冷酷无情的现金意味着它在需要时可以减少债务。

Our View

我们的观点

ResMed's interest cover suggests it can handle its debt as easily as Cristiano Ronaldo could score a goal against an under 14's goalkeeper. And that's just the beginning of the good news since its net debt to EBITDA is also very heartening. We would also note that Medical Equipment industry companies like ResMed commonly do use debt without problems. Overall, we don't think ResMed is taking any bad risks, as its debt load seems modest. So we're not worried about the use of a little leverage on the balance sheet. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. We've identified 1 warning sign with ResMed , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

瑞思迈的利息支付能力表明其可以像C罗在14岁以下门将面前进球一样轻松处理其债务。这只是好消息的开始,因为其净债务与息税折旧摊销前利润比也非常令人振奋。我们还应该注意,瑞思迈这样的医疗设备行业公司通常在使用债务时并没有问题。总体而言,我们认为瑞思迈没有承担任何不良风险,因为其负债负担似乎很适度。因此,我们对资产负债表上的一点杠杆使用并不担心。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表显然是开始的地方。然而,并非所有的投资风险都存在于资产负债表内,远非如此。我们已经确定了与瑞思迈相关的1个警示信号,了解它们应该是你投资过程的一部分。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

说到底,有时候更容易集中精力关注根本不需要债务的公司。读者可以免费访问零净债务增长股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发