Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Knife River Corporation (NYSE:KNF) With 83% Ownership
Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Knife River Corporation (NYSE:KNF) With 83% Ownership
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Knife River's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 18 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 机构持股比例较高意味着Knife River的股价对其交易行为非常敏感
- 前18大股东拥有该公司50%的所有权。
- 通过分析师预测数据和所有权研究,您可以更好地评估公司未来的业绩。
If you want to know who really controls Knife River Corporation (NYSE:KNF), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道谁实际控制着Knife River Corporation(纽交所:KNF),那么你就必须看看其股东注册表的构成。83%的持股比例,机构拥有公司中的最大股份。换句话说,该群体面对最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$4.5b in market cap. The one-year return on investment is currently 58% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上周,机构投资者在该公司市值达到45亿美元后获得了最大的受益。该公司一年的投资回报率目前为58%,上周的收益更是令人欢迎。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Knife River, beginning with the chart below.
让我们来深入了解Knife River的各种所有者,从下面的图表开始。
![1724761120759](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240827/42943217-0-672191a27872308fd078a8fb56c9bfcd.webp/bigjpg)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Knife River?
机构持有Knife River的股份,这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会做出糟糕的投资决策,就像其他人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,大股价下跌并不罕见。因此,值得检查Knife River的过去收益轨迹(如下)。当然,也要记住其他要考虑的因素。
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that Knife River does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Knife River, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到Knife River确实有机构投资者,他们持有公司的大部分股票。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依赖这个事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资,就像其他人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,股价大幅下跌是很常见的现象。因此,值得检查Knife River过去的盈利轨迹(如下所示)。当然,还要考虑其他因素。
![1724761122067](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240827/42943217-1-8bb28e604ddf7960d3be4a2232effa5c.webp/bigjpg)
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Knife River. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and Perpetual Limited holds about 3.6% of the company stock.
由于机构投资者持有超过一半的已发行股票,董事会可能不得不注意他们的偏好。我们注意到,对Knife River的投资基金没有意义。我们的数据显示,BlackRock, Inc.是最大的股东,持有12%的流通股份。第二大股东是Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有11%的普通股,Perpetual Limited持有约3.6%的公司股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 18 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
经过进一步的调查,我们发现前18名股东持有该公司50%的股份,这表明没有任何单个股东控制着该公司。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。
Insider Ownership Of Knife River
Knife River公司内部的持股情况
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同国家,内部人员的定义可能会略有不同,但董事会成员始终是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果管理人员是创始人或CEO,那么成为执行董事会成员也是很常见的。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Knife River Corporation. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$27m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我们最近的数据显示,内部人士拥有Knife River Corporation不到1%的股份。这是一家相当大的公司,所以董事会成员可能拥有该公司的重要利益,而且比例相对较小。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约2700万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。看到董事会成员持有股份是好事,但也值得检查这些内部人士是否一直在买入。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in Knife River. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公众,通常是个体投资者,持有Knife River 17%的股份。虽然这个群体不能决定事情,但肯定对公司的经营产生真正的影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Knife River .
我发现查看公司的实际所有者非常有趣。但要真正获得洞察,我们还需要考虑其他信息。为此,您应该注意我们在Knife River发现的1个警告信号。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。